13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when we talked about it. The elected <strong>of</strong>ficials didn't want it, <strong>the</strong> economicstudies were bad, operation was be<strong>com</strong>ing impossible, technologically it wasdifficult-but all that was after <strong>the</strong> codicil. From 1984 to 1987, as far as Icould tell, <strong>the</strong>re were no obvious problems except some delays, but that'sn<strong>or</strong>mal " [no. 38]M. Antoine, at <strong>the</strong> RATp, on <strong>the</strong> executive flo<strong>or</strong>:"If I understand c<strong>or</strong>rectly you supp<strong>or</strong>ted <strong>the</strong> CET but not <strong>Aramis</strong>?""Yes, you could put it that way. F<strong>or</strong> me, as an engineer, getting <strong>the</strong> rotarymot<strong>or</strong> to exceed 30 kilowatts, that's terrific. If it w<strong>or</strong>ked, <strong>the</strong>re'd be no m<strong>or</strong>ereduction gears, no m<strong>or</strong>e elasticity-it'd be great. F<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> time being, we don'tknow how to do it, but maybe someday we will."And electronic coupling is <strong>the</strong> same st<strong>or</strong>y. If we'd done <strong>the</strong> development,in <strong>the</strong> eET, it would be colossal, on <strong>the</strong> European scale, and we'd have said,'Here's <strong>the</strong> development, now we have to keep going' . ."I always told Matra : 'There's just one thing that interests me, and that'selectronic coupling, if it's cheaper than <strong>the</strong> mechanical version.' <strong>Aramis</strong> wouldhave made its contribution to <strong>the</strong> research on lowering materials costs; that'swhat I was hoping f<strong>or</strong> from <strong>the</strong> eEl"If it had been up to me, I would have preferred to spend 100 million francswith all <strong>the</strong> builders w<strong>or</strong>king toge<strong>the</strong>r. I would have said: 'We've made VAL,<strong>the</strong> first generation, now we have to shift over to <strong>the</strong> second-generation VAL,which should have <strong>the</strong> same capabilities but cost 30 percent less.' That's whatI would have done in 1984, but <strong>the</strong>y didn't ask my advice."There was some useful fallout, though-o<strong>the</strong>rwise it wouldn't bear thinkingabout."Automated mechanisms ought to evolve acc<strong>or</strong>ding to modular concepts,like Lego, in <strong>the</strong> early stages, and <strong>the</strong>n in standardized black boxes. I wasexpecting <strong>the</strong>y'd be able to pull a speed-control module out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aramis</strong>, f<strong>or</strong>example. F<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> time being, <strong>the</strong>y're bringing a specific solution to everyspecific problem.""But why not tum <strong>the</strong> CET into an R&D proiect, <strong>the</strong>n? The modular approachis entirely different from trying to build a <strong>com</strong>plete system.""Because it's impossible. The industrial milieu is a battleground. They pickaway at each o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y're like roosters on a pile <strong>of</strong> manure pulling out eacho<strong>the</strong>r's fea<strong>the</strong>rs, and pretty soon <strong>the</strong>y won't have any fea<strong>the</strong>rs left!"I still don 't understand: since it is research, why not say s02""Because <strong>the</strong> eET was tied up with <strong>the</strong> hope <strong>of</strong> constructing a line and with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!