13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"Yet in spite <strong>of</strong> its fragility, its sensitivity, how have we treated it?"Like an un<strong>com</strong>plicated development project that could unfold insuccessive phases from <strong>the</strong> drawing boards to a metro system that wouldrun with 14,000 passengers an hour in <strong>the</strong> south Paris region everyday, twenty-four hours a day."Here is our mistake, one we all made, <strong>the</strong> only one we made.You had a hypersensitive project, and you treated it as if you could getit through under its own steam. But you weren't nuclear power, youweren't <strong>the</strong> army; you weren't able to make <strong>the</strong> ministries, <strong>the</strong> BudgetOffice, <strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> passengers behave in such a way as to adapt <strong>the</strong>mselvesto <strong>Aramis</strong>' subtle variations, to its hesitations and its moods. And youleft <strong>Aramis</strong> to cope under its own steam when it was actually weak andfragile. You believed in <strong>the</strong> autonomy <strong>of</strong> technology."If <strong>the</strong> Budget Office can kill <strong>Aramis</strong>, what should you do, if youreally care about it? Impose yourselves on <strong>the</strong> Budget Office, f<strong>or</strong>ce itto accept <strong>Aramis</strong>. You can't do that? Then don't ask <strong>Aramis</strong> to be capable<strong>of</strong> doing it on its own . If elected <strong>of</strong>ficials from <strong>the</strong> south Paris regioncan kill <strong>Aramis</strong>, what should you do? Make <strong>the</strong>m change <strong>the</strong>ir minds,<strong>or</strong> get o<strong>the</strong>r ones elected. You don't think you have <strong>the</strong> power? Thendon't expect that <strong>Aramis</strong> will. The laws <strong>of</strong> physics and <strong>the</strong> three-bodyproblem make it impossible to calculate <strong>the</strong> displacements <strong>of</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e thanthree pairs <strong>of</strong> cars? Can you change physics, redo Poincare's calculations?No? Then don't charge <strong>Aramis</strong>' pairs <strong>of</strong> cars with <strong>the</strong> overwhelmingtask <strong>of</strong> handling, all by <strong>the</strong>mselves, knowledge that even GodAlmighty may not have. It's only in h<strong>or</strong>r<strong>or</strong> st<strong>or</strong>ies and epistemologicaltreatises that omniscient humanoids invade <strong>the</strong> w<strong>or</strong>ld on <strong>the</strong>ir own andreshape it to <strong>the</strong>ir own needs. In w<strong>or</strong>lds like <strong>the</strong>irs, don't ask <strong>the</strong>impossible. You want <strong>Aramis</strong> to be automated, irreversible, real? It willbe, it could be, it could have been. But at <strong>the</strong> beginning it is still unreal,reversible, manual, terribly manual. Don't ask <strong>Aramis</strong>, don't ask aproject, to do something you, as individuals and c<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ate bodies, findyourselves incapable <strong>of</strong> ac<strong>com</strong>plishing. Ei<strong>the</strong>r you change <strong>the</strong> w<strong>or</strong>ld toadapt it to <strong>the</strong> nominal <strong>Aramis</strong>, <strong>or</strong> else, yes, you need-you needed-tochange <strong>Aramis</strong>.EPILOGUe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!