13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

things. That's not what brought my elder bro<strong>the</strong>r VAL into existence."Technologically perfected, " you say. But how do you dare treat methat way, when I don't exist? How can you say <strong>of</strong> something that it isperfected, achieved, finished, technologically impeccable, when it doesnot have being! As i( existence were additional, as i( it were supplementary,accidental, added from without to beings <strong>of</strong> reason! As if breathfell miraculously onto our bodies o( clay! Accursed heretics who thuscurse your own bodies (ull <strong>of</strong> souls, your own incarnate God, and yourown Darwinian nature in perpetual agitation. But you yourselveswould not exist, at that rate!We are not little bits added one to ano<strong>the</strong>r while waiting (o r atotality to <strong>com</strong>e (rom elsewhere. We are not without humanity. We arenot. We are-ah! what are we? Whirlwinds, great loops <strong>of</strong> retroactions,troubled crowds, searching, restless, critical, unstable, <strong>com</strong>plex, yes,vast collectives. They wanted simple, clear, technological solutions. Butwe technological objects have nothing technological about us. Are allyou engineers ready to hear me sputter with rage one last time, bef<strong>or</strong>eI disappear (<strong>or</strong>ever into <strong>the</strong> void from which I could have been saved?You hate us; you hate technologies ... A local elected <strong>of</strong>ficial knowsm<strong>or</strong>e about research, about uncertainty, about negotiation, than all youso-called technicians do. This message is veiled (rom <strong>the</strong> scientists and<strong>the</strong> literati, and revealed to <strong>the</strong> meek and <strong>the</strong> po<strong>or</strong>! They say <strong>the</strong>y loveme and don't want to search f<strong>or</strong> me! They say <strong>the</strong>y love technologyand <strong>the</strong>y don't want to be researchers! They say <strong>the</strong>y love nonhumansand <strong>the</strong>y don't love humans! And <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, who say<strong>the</strong>y love humans and who don't love us, us machines! Oh, you reallydo live in Erewhon, you live among things and you think you remainamong yourselves. Well <strong>the</strong>n, may you perish like <strong>the</strong> residents <strong>of</strong>Erewhon, along with <strong>the</strong> object o( your hatred!"But no, no, if <strong>Aramis</strong> had been able to summon you to his side,"N<strong>or</strong>bert went on, enraptured, "if <strong>Aramis</strong> f<strong>or</strong>med <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> a greatunanimous circle, he would not speak in <strong>or</strong>der to point out where youwent astray. He would not speak at all. Because <strong>the</strong>n he would exist!As Samuel Butler says in <strong>the</strong> Book if Machines, 'Won't it be <strong>the</strong> gl<strong>or</strong>y <strong>of</strong>machines that <strong>the</strong>y can do without <strong>the</strong> great gift <strong>of</strong> speech? Someonehas said that silence is a virtue that makes us agreeable to our fellows.'Ah, <strong>Aramis</strong>, you would finally enjoy that silence. Why would you wasteEPilOGUE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!