13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> a netw<strong>or</strong>k, to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>se intervals can be equalto <strong>the</strong> int erval on <strong>the</strong> <strong>com</strong>mon trunk line;-to <strong>of</strong>fer, in <strong>the</strong> most sophisticated version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Aramis</strong> system, direct <strong>or</strong> semidirect services, by using <strong>of</strong>flinestat ions; certain pairs <strong>of</strong> cars from a train may in effectsh<strong>or</strong>t-circuit <strong>the</strong> station by taking <strong>the</strong> main track andavoid intermediate stops .In addition to <strong>the</strong> specific features described above, <strong>the</strong>chief characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system are <strong>the</strong> following:-<strong>the</strong> small size and thus <strong>the</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> insertion in an urbansite, <strong>the</strong> minimum curve radius being 10 meters without passengersat <strong>the</strong> terminus, 25 meters with passengers on <strong>the</strong>lines;-<strong>the</strong> very bri ef servi ce interval .The rep<strong>or</strong>t presented <strong>the</strong> 1987 <strong>Aramis</strong>, w<strong>or</strong>d f<strong>or</strong> w<strong>or</strong>d, as identicalto Petit and Bardet's 1970 <strong>Aramis</strong>. I myself had found twenty-oneinterpretations, but <strong>the</strong> technological documents remained mute aboutthis dispersion. <strong>Aramis</strong> had not inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ated any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transf<strong>or</strong>mations<strong>of</strong> its environment. It had remained purely an object, a pure object.Remote from <strong>the</strong> social arena, remote from hist<strong>or</strong>y; intact. This wassurely it, <strong>the</strong> hidden staircase N<strong>or</strong>bert was looking f<strong>or</strong>. Its soul and itsbody, as he would say, never merged.I saw my pr<strong>of</strong>ess<strong>or</strong> again only on <strong>the</strong> eve <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debriefing sessionthat he called "restitution." While I was stamping my feet in excitement,he seemed to be at a low point."Oh, I'm all washed up," he told me. "I'm going to change careers.<strong>Technology</strong> isn't f<strong>or</strong> me. Even in dreams I haven't been able to embraceFrankenstein's creature. I've pulled away in h<strong>or</strong>r<strong>or</strong>. I've been a coward .I haven't reached any credible conclusion. I'm going to go back toclassical culture. Do <strong>the</strong>ology again. Reread Tacitus, as my Poly techniquecolleague Finkielkraut advises. Habermas is right, after all; <strong>the</strong>re's nolove, no culture, in technologies. The far<strong>the</strong>r behind you leave <strong>the</strong>m ,<strong>the</strong> better you think. How about you, what have you found? We dohave to turn in a rep<strong>or</strong>t. And you're <strong>the</strong> engineer, after all."III' __ ARAMISI SREADYTOGOIAWAYI____________________________ __

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!