13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it's not like <strong>the</strong> Conc<strong>or</strong>de. And <strong>the</strong>re are <strong>the</strong> skyrocketing prices! Still,<strong>the</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contradict<strong>or</strong>y rep<strong>or</strong>t is positive. Ah, now Iunderstand why it's called a "contradict<strong>or</strong>y rep<strong>or</strong>t" . . .[INTERVIEW EXCERPTS]M. Trouve, an imp<strong>or</strong>tant technological direct<strong>or</strong> at <strong>the</strong> RATP "It's easy enoughto show that it's feasible with three cars, but it's a <strong>com</strong>pletely different matterto say whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>or</strong> not it can be produced and implemented . We started witha good automation system, with <strong>the</strong> two-pair train; and it m<strong>or</strong>e <strong>or</strong> less w<strong>or</strong>kedwith three."We told ourselves, 'It's almost <strong>the</strong>re,' yes, but when we got rolling. it waswithout safely measures, and when we added those we were in <strong>the</strong> manualmode, not automatic . . . It's not <strong>the</strong> same thing."The first phase may be misleading. Matra relied on it a lot, m<strong>or</strong>eover-'Itwas almost ready.' I had to fight to keep <strong>the</strong> codicil from declaring that it washomologated ."In fact, <strong>the</strong> codicil was a disaster. Matra wanted to turn over <strong>the</strong> key; weinsisted on winding things up properly. I have to say that Matra also made ita point <strong>of</strong> hon<strong>or</strong> to go fur<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>the</strong>y stopped on December 1 1 instead <strong>of</strong>November 30."But finally, <strong>the</strong>y didn't bring <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> demonstration. I personally insisted onseeing three pairs <strong>of</strong> cars running toge<strong>the</strong>r. They would have yelled, 'Ho<strong>or</strong>ayf<strong>or</strong> us!' They did <strong>the</strong>ir best; <strong>the</strong>y didn't make it."But with two pairs, <strong>the</strong>y achieved a good level <strong>of</strong> reliability. They transp<strong>or</strong>tedChirac and Balladur, without stressing <strong>the</strong> safely issue.""But in your iudgment, was it technologically viable?""There was <strong>the</strong> <strong>com</strong>plete technical review <strong>of</strong> 1982-83; we had concludedthat it was viable. I continue to think that it is, but in a time frame that I havetrouble extrapolating-and anyway, it's a luxury system, it's <strong>the</strong> Conc<strong>or</strong>de <strong>of</strong>public transp<strong>or</strong>tation . . ."Let's say <strong>the</strong>re were no fact<strong>or</strong>s precluding <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aramis</strong>; that was<strong>the</strong> opinion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> technology <strong>com</strong>mittee. We couldn't see <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tunnel,but we hod no reason to think that it wasn't <strong>the</strong>re."The problem is that even if <strong>the</strong>y'd gotten an extension, Matra's direct<strong>or</strong>swouldn't have gone on; <strong>the</strong>y'd lost interest in <strong>the</strong> problem. Builders have a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!