13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

agree. "They're aiming at VA L in spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>com</strong>plicated <strong>Aramis</strong> that wewanted to impose on <strong>the</strong>m." "We were aiming at VAL in spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> useless<strong>com</strong>plications that <strong>the</strong>y wanted to impose on us." This superposition is anexception. The methodological rule that consists in letting <strong>the</strong> act<strong>or</strong>s defineeach o<strong>the</strong>r can ac<strong>com</strong>modate all cases, including <strong>the</strong> miraculous one <strong>of</strong>agreement between <strong>the</strong> one who is defining and <strong>the</strong> one who is beingdefined."But all <strong>the</strong>se interviews, N<strong>or</strong>bert-we're doing <strong>the</strong>m in 1987and talking about 1981, 1982, 1984. How can \"le believe <strong>the</strong>se people?And besides, <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> project has been terminated makes <strong>the</strong>meven less believable. They all know what happened. They can all tell usst<strong>or</strong>ies about ineluctable destiny; it doesn't cost <strong>the</strong>m a thing.""They're all telling us st<strong>or</strong>ies, that's f<strong>or</strong> sure. But <strong>the</strong>y all tell<strong>the</strong>mselves st<strong>or</strong>ies, st<strong>or</strong>ies about strategy, scenarios, with lots <strong>of</strong> thingslike: 'Once upon a time <strong>the</strong>re was an RATP that wanted to get evenf<strong>or</strong> being humiliated'; <strong>or</strong> 'Once upon a time <strong>the</strong>re was a charmingcapitalist who dreamed <strong>of</strong> entering Paris right under <strong>the</strong> king's nose. 'We have to write everything down, that's all. Who's saying it? Aboutwhom? To whom? When? Referring to what period?"So you write it down:"M. Freque, on such-and-such a date, tells us (that's you and me),speaking about 1984, that in his opinion <strong>the</strong> RATP, represented byM. Girard, wanted such-and-such a thing and that he learned it byundergoing such-and-such a trial."Look at <strong>the</strong> note he didn't want to let us have. That's anexperiment. He thought <strong>the</strong> RATP was flexible and ready f<strong>or</strong> a <strong>com</strong>promise.He notices that he was wrong. That <strong>the</strong> RATP was furious,that Matra had to change its language. He tells us, us, that this experimentrevealed to him <strong>the</strong> true goals and inclinations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> RATP.""But is it true? Did it really happen that way? Did <strong>the</strong> RATP reallywant that?""We don't know a thing about it, and that's not <strong>the</strong> issue. All wedo is write down <strong>the</strong> st<strong>or</strong>ies people tell us."•

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!