13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1985: Scale model <strong>of</strong> two-car <strong>Aramis</strong> presented. 1986:First two-car unit delivered; two-tiered <strong>Aramis</strong>proposed; studies <strong>of</strong> potential ridership; Chiracnamed prime minister; Quin leaves <strong>the</strong> RATP.1987: Termination <strong>of</strong> project announced; fifth two-carunit delivered; three weeks <strong>of</strong> contradict<strong>or</strong>y testruns; project halted; postm<strong>or</strong>tem study begun.[INTERVIEW EXCERPTS]M. Lievin, INRETS engineer:"<strong>Aramis</strong> is <strong>the</strong> last <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PRT systems, you know. ""PRT?""It was fashionable at <strong>the</strong> time-Personal Rapid Transit, PRT. Everybody wasexcited about it.""When was this?""Oh, around <strong>the</strong> sixties. The Kennedy era. Private cars were on <strong>the</strong> wayout-that's what everyone was saying. But at <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> advantages<strong>of</strong> cars had to be maintained; we couldn't keep moving in <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> masstransp<strong>or</strong>tation." [no. 15]M. Etienne, at Matra:"In 1972 <strong>the</strong> Transp<strong>or</strong>t Expo took place in Washington. That exhibit wascritical f<strong>or</strong> PRTs . Everybody in <strong>the</strong> w<strong>or</strong>ld came. There were Boeing systems,<strong>the</strong>re were Bendix systems. People were beginning to recognize <strong>the</strong> potential<strong>of</strong> <strong>com</strong>puters. It seemed logical to control vehicles from a central <strong>com</strong>puter. "[no. 21]M. Cohen, speaking at Matra's Besanr;:on oFFice:"All <strong>the</strong> maj<strong>or</strong> manufacturers plunged into PRTs: Boeing, Otis, we did <strong>the</strong>same thing at Matra . There were at least ten different systems. None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mw<strong>or</strong>ked . <strong>Aramis</strong> is <strong>the</strong> one that lasted <strong>the</strong> longest; it was <strong>the</strong> most credible,finally. We wouldn't do it <strong>the</strong> same way today; we wouldn't tell ourselves that,well, we know how to make planes and satellites, great, mass transp<strong>or</strong>tationmust be a cinch. It's not true; it's not that easy. A train may well be m<strong>or</strong>e<strong>com</strong>plicated than a satellite, technologically speaking." [no. 45]Mr. Britten, on American private consultant in Paris:"With PRTs, what doesn't w<strong>or</strong>k is <strong>the</strong> P. P means people, not personal. Weknew from <strong>the</strong> beginning that that part didn't have a chance. In 1975-1 haveAN EXCITININNOVATION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!