13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

control room, by Ferbeck (who is also its fa<strong>the</strong>r), by Lagardere (who is alsoits fa<strong>the</strong>r), by <strong>the</strong> RATP (which claims to be its fa<strong>the</strong>r), by Aisthom (whichalso claims to be its fa<strong>the</strong>r)-all <strong>the</strong>se descriptions are going to vary, andespecially on <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> paternity! There are as many points <strong>of</strong> viewas <strong>the</strong>re are heads. But <strong>the</strong>se points <strong>of</strong> view are all focused on a <strong>com</strong>monobject, as if, while walking around a statue, each person were <strong>of</strong>fering adifferent description that was never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>com</strong>patible with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Exceptf<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> view, <strong>the</strong> description is <strong>the</strong> same. VAL, because it exists,unifies points <strong>of</strong> view. It transf<strong>or</strong>ms people's opinions <strong>of</strong> it into "simple"points <strong>of</strong> view about an object that remains independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. With<strong>Aramis</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is nothing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>or</strong>t. Since it does not exist, it cannot unifypoints <strong>of</strong> view. There are as many possible <strong>Aramis</strong>es as <strong>the</strong>re are mindsand points <strong>of</strong> view. Matra's point <strong>of</strong> view and <strong>the</strong> RATP's and <strong>the</strong> ministry'sare irreconcilable; within <strong>the</strong> RATP, within Matra, within <strong>the</strong> ministry, individualopinions are equally irreconcilable; <strong>the</strong> same Matra engineer, fromone interview to ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> same ministry <strong>of</strong>ficial, between <strong>the</strong> beginning<strong>of</strong> an interview and <strong>the</strong> end, will also have irreconcilable viewpoints.They really don't know. Their opinions can't agree, since f<strong>or</strong> want <strong>of</strong>agreement among <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> object has failed to exist independently <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m.Schooled by my pr<strong>of</strong>ess<strong>or</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> objectivity (N<strong>or</strong>bertcalled my school <strong>the</strong> College <strong>of</strong> Unreason, in an allusion to Butler'sbook), I had trouble getting used to <strong>the</strong> idea that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Aramis</strong> act<strong>or</strong>swere all telling us st<strong>or</strong>ies. At Orly, however, <strong>the</strong>y had tried to tell ast<strong>or</strong>y that held toge<strong>the</strong>r. To do so, <strong>the</strong>y had gone ahead and developedbits and pieces in <strong>the</strong>ir w<strong>or</strong>kshop. They had gone to hangars, tocatalogues, to manufacturers looking f<strong>or</strong> electric mot<strong>or</strong>s, auto bodies,laser and ultrasound recept<strong>or</strong>s, chips, concrete-and-steel sandwiches,feeder rails, electric circuits, emergency brakes, do<strong>or</strong>s, and-to makeit all w<strong>or</strong>k-activat<strong>or</strong>s with little electric mot<strong>or</strong>s. They really did tryto bind all <strong>the</strong> different elements toge<strong>the</strong>r. But <strong>Aramis</strong> didn't hold up.It turned back into a heap <strong>of</strong> disconnected scrap metal.I had my own private interpretation, but I no longer dared expressit to N<strong>or</strong>bert. <strong>Aramis</strong> didn't hold up because it was untenable. Period.From <strong>the</strong> very beginning, it was a fiction, a utopia, a two-headed calf.IS ARAlVl IS FEASIBLE2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!