10.05.2016 Views

Final Program

h6okmgq

h6okmgq

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

398 WEDNESDAY • MAY 18<br />

D88<br />

BEHAVIORAL • CLINICAL<br />

SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM<br />

CME Credits Available: 2.0<br />

THE PATIENT-CENTERED JUGGERNAUT: THE<br />

RIGHT MOVE FOR CLINICAL CARE, POLICY, AND<br />

RESEARCH?<br />

Assemblies on Behavioral Science and Health Services Research;<br />

Critical Care; Thoracic Oncology<br />

1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. MOSCONE CENTER<br />

Room 303/305 (South Building, Esplanade Level)<br />

Target Audience<br />

Clinicians or researchers who incorporate patient centered outcomes in their<br />

practice or research.<br />

Objectives<br />

At the conclusion of this session, the participant will be able to:<br />

• understand the benefits and limitations of patient and family satisfaction as<br />

a quality metric in critical care;<br />

• learn about advantages and disadvantages of shared decision making as a<br />

policy requirement in lung cancer screening;<br />

• determine if the methods to conduct high quality patient engaged research<br />

are available for implementation by researchers.<br />

There is an emerging trend toward incorporating patients' values, opinions and<br />

feedback in both patient care and research. Patient engagement is expected to<br />

address patients’ health care concerns and close the gaps in evidence needed<br />

to improve key outcomes. However, it remains unclear how this process will<br />

actually improve meaningful clinical outcomes and research products. Despite<br />

the difficulties in measuring the benefits and harms of this strategy, patient<br />

centered approaches are being adopted in clinical care, health policy and<br />

research. We will select case examples from key pillars of PCCM to highlight<br />

the current controversies for and against incorporating patient centered<br />

outcomes.<br />

Chairing: D.R. Sullivan, MD, MA, Portland, OR<br />

L.C. Feemster, MD, MSc, Seattle, WA<br />

R.S. Wiener, MD, MPH, Boston, MA<br />

1:30 A Patient’s Perspective<br />

J. Lefferts, San Francisco, CA<br />

1:35 Incorporating Patient Centered Outcomes in Clinical Practice<br />

and Research<br />

S.D. Halpern, MD, PhD, Philadelphia, PA<br />

1:47 PRO: Patient and Family Satisfaction is a Key Quality Metric in<br />

Critical Care<br />

E.K. Kross, MD, Seattle, WA<br />

2:02 CON: Patient and Family Satisfaction is a Key Quality Metric in<br />

Critical Care<br />

G.D. Rubenfeld, MD, MSc, Toronto, Canada<br />

2:17 General Discussion<br />

2:21 CON: Shared Decision Making Improves Outcomes in Lung<br />

Cancer Screening<br />

C.G. Slatore, MD, Portland, OR<br />

2:36 PRO: Shared Decision Making Improves Outcomes in Lung<br />

Cancer Screening<br />

R.S. Wiener, MD, MPH, Boston, MA<br />

2:51 General Discussion<br />

2:55 PRO: We Possess the Methods to Conduct High Quality<br />

Patient Engaged Research<br />

S. Parthasarathy, MD, Tucson, AZ<br />

3:10 CON: We Possess the Methods to Conduct High Quality<br />

Patient Engaged Research<br />

M. Helfand, MD, MS, MPH, Portland, OR<br />

3:25 General Discussion<br />

D89<br />

BASIC • CLINICAL • TRANSLATIONAL<br />

SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM<br />

CME Credits Available: 2.0<br />

NOVEL APPROACHES TO TREAT PULMONARY<br />

INFECTIONS<br />

Assemblies on Allergy, Immunology and Inflammation; Microbiology,<br />

Tuberculosis and Pulmonary Infections; Pediatrics; Respiratory Cell and<br />

Molecular Biology; Respiratory Structure and Function<br />

1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. MOSCONE CENTER<br />

Room 3007/3009 (West Building, Level 3)<br />

Target Audience<br />

Scientists, physician scientists and clinicians working on developing and<br />

utilizing novel therapeutics to treat and prevent pulmonary infections.<br />

Objectives<br />

At the conclusion of this session, the participant will be able to:<br />

• identify novel strategies for treatment of respiratory infection.<br />

• understand how these novel therapies target the pathogen or the host to<br />

promote innate immune clearance.<br />

• recognize and understand the pitfalls and/or challenges present in the<br />

development of such therapies.<br />

Opportunistic bacterial pathogens are a common cause of respiratory infection,<br />

especially in the immune compromised or in hospital settings. Widespread use<br />

of broad spectrum antibiotics has led to the emergence of antibiotic resistance<br />

in a group of respiratory pathogens labeled the ESKAPE pathogens<br />

(Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae,<br />

Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species)<br />

and damaging effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiome. These factors,<br />

coupled with a reduction in the discovery rate of new antimicrobial therapies,<br />

necessitate efforts aimed at identifying novel and potentially pathogen specific<br />

antimicrobial therapeutics. This session will highlight recent discovery of novel<br />

treatment modalities for respiratory infection and exacerbation, including<br />

strategies targeting both the microbe and the host.<br />

Chairing: J.K. Kolls, MD, Pittsburgh, PA<br />

T. Cohen, PhD, Gaithersburg, MD<br />

1:30 Antibodies: A Pathogen Specific Approach to Combating<br />

Respiratory Infection<br />

S. Projan, PhD, Gaithersburg, MD<br />

ATS 2016 • San Francisco

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!