27.04.2017 Views

Allan Kardec-THE Spirit's Book_ The Principles of Spiritist Doctrine (1989)

Entre los anos 1830 y 1857. Allan Kardec fue un hombre que amaso las mas grandes riquezas de "Material-dado por espiritus" que jamaz se hayan asemblado. El compilo y organizo esta vasta cantidad de informacion que se relaciona y toca con el aqui y hora, cuan inmensos son. Divinas y terrenales leyes , los reinos de los espiritus. El despues y el mas alla. Estos forman sus escrituras y son la fundacion para el " Movimiento Muldial-Internacional Espiritista." El libro de los espiritus. He aqui la version de 1989.

Entre los anos 1830 y 1857. Allan Kardec fue un hombre que amaso las mas grandes riquezas de "Material-dado por espiritus" que jamaz se hayan asemblado. El compilo y organizo esta vasta cantidad de informacion que se relaciona y toca con el aqui y hora, cuan inmensos son. Divinas y terrenales leyes , los reinos de los espiritus. El despues y el mas alla.
Estos forman sus escrituras y son la fundacion para el " Movimiento Muldial-Internacional Espiritista."

El libro de los espiritus. He aqui la version de 1989.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

141<br />

<strong>THE</strong> SPIRITS’ BOOK<br />

destitution, has to endure many privations through the smallness <strong>of</strong> his means, and says to<br />

him, "Here is an immence fortune, <strong>of</strong> which you may have the enjoyment, on condition that<br />

you work hard during one minute." <strong>The</strong> laziest <strong>of</strong> men, in response to such an <strong>of</strong>fer, would<br />

say, without hesitation, "I am ready to work for one minute, for two minutes, for an hour, for<br />

a whole day if necessary! What is a day's labour in comparison with the certainty <strong>of</strong> ease and<br />

plenty for all the rest <strong>of</strong> my life?"<br />

But what is the duration <strong>of</strong> a corporeal life in comparison with eternity? Less than a minute;<br />

less than a moment.<br />

We sometimes hear people bring forward the following lug argument: -"God, who is<br />

sovereignly good, cannot impose upon man the hard necessity <strong>of</strong> recommencing a series <strong>of</strong><br />

sorrows and tribulations." But would there be more kindness in condemning a man to<br />

perpetual suffering for a few moments <strong>of</strong> error than in giving him the means <strong>of</strong> repairing his<br />

faults?<br />

"Two manufacturers had each a workman no might hope to become some day the partner <strong>of</strong><br />

his employer. But it happened that both workmen made so very bad a use <strong>of</strong> their day that<br />

they merited dismissal. One <strong>of</strong> the manufacturers drove away his unfaithful workman, despite<br />

his supplications; and this workman, being unable to obtain any other employment, died <strong>of</strong><br />

want. <strong>The</strong> other said to his workman-'You have wasted a day; you owe me compensation for<br />

the loss you have thus caused me. You have done your work badly; you owe me reparation<br />

for it. I give you leave to begin it over again. Try to do well, and I will keep you in my<br />

employ, and you may still aspire to the superior position which I had promised you."<br />

Need we ask which <strong>of</strong> the manufacturers ',as shown himself to be the most humane? And<br />

would God, who is clemency itself, be more inexorable than a just and compassionate man ?<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea that our fate is decided forever by a few years <strong>of</strong> trial, and notwithstanding the fact<br />

that it was not in our power to attain to perfection while we remained upon the earth. fills the<br />

mind with anguish; while the contrary idea is eminently consoling, for it leaves us hope.<br />

Thus, without pronouncing for or against the plurality <strong>of</strong> existences, without admitting either<br />

hypothesis in preference to the other, we assert that, if the matter were left to our own choice,<br />

there is no one who would prefer incurring a sentence against which there should be no<br />

appeal. A philosopher has said that "if God did not exist, it would be necessary to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!