27.04.2017 Views

Allan Kardec-THE Spirit's Book_ The Principles of Spiritist Doctrine (1989)

Entre los anos 1830 y 1857. Allan Kardec fue un hombre que amaso las mas grandes riquezas de "Material-dado por espiritus" que jamaz se hayan asemblado. El compilo y organizo esta vasta cantidad de informacion que se relaciona y toca con el aqui y hora, cuan inmensos son. Divinas y terrenales leyes , los reinos de los espiritus. El despues y el mas alla. Estos forman sus escrituras y son la fundacion para el " Movimiento Muldial-Internacional Espiritista." El libro de los espiritus. He aqui la version de 1989.

Entre los anos 1830 y 1857. Allan Kardec fue un hombre que amaso las mas grandes riquezas de "Material-dado por espiritus" que jamaz se hayan asemblado. El compilo y organizo esta vasta cantidad de informacion que se relaciona y toca con el aqui y hora, cuan inmensos son. Divinas y terrenales leyes , los reinos de los espiritus. El despues y el mas alla.
Estos forman sus escrituras y son la fundacion para el " Movimiento Muldial-Internacional Espiritista."

El libro de los espiritus. He aqui la version de 1989.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

263<br />

<strong>THE</strong> SPIRITS’ BOOK<br />

may raise himself very high. As regards his physical nature, man is like the animals, and less<br />

well provided for than many <strong>of</strong> them; for nature has given to them all that man is obliged to<br />

invent with the aid <strong>of</strong> his intelligence for his needs and his preservation. His body is subject<br />

to. destruction, like that <strong>of</strong> the animals; but his spirit has a destiny that he alone can<br />

understand, because he alone ~s completely free. Poor human beings who debase yourselves<br />

below the brutes! do you not know how to distinguish yourselves from them ? Recognise the<br />

superiority <strong>of</strong> man by his possessing the notion <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> God."<br />

593. Can the animals be said to act only from instinct?<br />

"That, again, is a mere theory. It is very true that instinct predominates in the greater number<br />

<strong>of</strong> animals; but do you not see some <strong>of</strong> them act with a determinate will ? This is intelligence;<br />

but <strong>of</strong> narrow range."<br />

It is impossible to deny that some animals give evidence <strong>of</strong> possessing, besides instinct, the power <strong>of</strong><br />

performing compound acts which denote the will to act in a determinate direction, and according to<br />

circumstances. Consequently, there is in them a sort <strong>of</strong> intelligence, but the exercise <strong>of</strong> which is mainly<br />

concentrated on the means <strong>of</strong> satisfying their physical needs, and providing for their own preservation.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is, among them. no progress, no amelioration no matter what the art that we admire in their<br />

labours, what they formerly did, that they do today neither better nor worse, according to constant forms<br />

and unvarying proportions. <strong>The</strong> young bird isolated from the rest <strong>of</strong> its species none the less builds its<br />

nest on the same model, without having been taught. If some <strong>of</strong> the animals are susceptible <strong>of</strong> a certain<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> education, their intellectual development, always restricted within narrow limits, Is due to the<br />

action <strong>of</strong> man upon a flexible nature, for they themselves have no power <strong>of</strong> progressing but that artificial<br />

development is ephemeral and purely individual, for the animal, when left again to himself, speedily<br />

returns within the limits traced out for it by nature.<br />

594. Have animals a language?<br />

"If you mean a language formed <strong>of</strong> words and syllables, no; but if you mean a method <strong>of</strong><br />

communication among themselves, yes. <strong>The</strong>y say much more to one another than you<br />

suppose; but their language is limited, like their ideas, to their bodily wants."<br />

-<strong>The</strong>re are animals who have no voice; have they no language?<br />

"<strong>The</strong>y understand one another by other means. Have men no other method <strong>of</strong> communicating<br />

with one another than by speech ? And the dumb, what do you say <strong>of</strong> them ? <strong>The</strong> animals,<br />

being endowed with the life <strong>of</strong> relation, have means <strong>of</strong> giving one another information, and <strong>of</strong><br />

expressing the sensations they feel. Do you suppose that fishes have no understanding among<br />

themselves ? Man has not the exclusive privilege <strong>of</strong> language; but that <strong>of</strong> the animals is<br />

instinctive and limited to the scope <strong>of</strong> their wants and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!