27.04.2017 Views

Allan Kardec-THE Spirit's Book_ The Principles of Spiritist Doctrine (1989)

Entre los anos 1830 y 1857. Allan Kardec fue un hombre que amaso las mas grandes riquezas de "Material-dado por espiritus" que jamaz se hayan asemblado. El compilo y organizo esta vasta cantidad de informacion que se relaciona y toca con el aqui y hora, cuan inmensos son. Divinas y terrenales leyes , los reinos de los espiritus. El despues y el mas alla. Estos forman sus escrituras y son la fundacion para el " Movimiento Muldial-Internacional Espiritista." El libro de los espiritus. He aqui la version de 1989.

Entre los anos 1830 y 1857. Allan Kardec fue un hombre que amaso las mas grandes riquezas de "Material-dado por espiritus" que jamaz se hayan asemblado. El compilo y organizo esta vasta cantidad de informacion que se relaciona y toca con el aqui y hora, cuan inmensos son. Divinas y terrenales leyes , los reinos de los espiritus. El despues y el mas alla.
Estos forman sus escrituras y son la fundacion para el " Movimiento Muldial-Internacional Espiritista."

El libro de los espiritus. He aqui la version de 1989.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

302<br />

ALLAN KARDEC<br />

"Ask yourselves to whom such a life is useful, and you will have the reply to your question. If<br />

such a life is only for him who leads it, and if it prevents him from doing good to others, it is<br />

only a form <strong>of</strong> selfishness, whatever the pretext with which it is coloured. True mortification,<br />

according to the dictates <strong>of</strong> Christian charity, is to impose privation and labour upon yourselves<br />

for the good <strong>of</strong> others."<br />

722. Is there any foundation in reason for the abstinence from certain aliments practised<br />

among various peoples?<br />

"Whatever man can eat without injury to his health is permitted to him. Legislators may have<br />

prohibited certain aliments for some useful end, and, in order to give greater weight to their<br />

prohibitions, have represented them as emanating from God."<br />

723. Is the use <strong>of</strong> animal food by man contrary to the law <strong>of</strong> nature?<br />

"With your physical constitution, flesh is useful for nourishing flesh; without this kind <strong>of</strong><br />

sustenance man's strength declines. <strong>The</strong> law <strong>of</strong> preservation makes it a duty for man to keep<br />

up his health and strength, that he may fulfil the law <strong>of</strong> labour. He should therefore feed<br />

himself according to the requirements <strong>of</strong> his organisation."<br />

724. Is there any merit in abstinence from any particular kind <strong>of</strong> food, animal or other, when<br />

undergone as an expiation?<br />

"Yes, if undergone for the sake <strong>of</strong> others; but God cannot regard as meritorious any<br />

abstinence that does not impose a real privation, and that has not a serious and useful aim.<br />

This is why we say that those whose fasting is only apparent are hypocrites." (720.)<br />

725. What is to be thought <strong>of</strong> the mutilation <strong>of</strong> the bodies <strong>of</strong> men or <strong>of</strong> animals?<br />

"What is the use <strong>of</strong> asking such a question ? Ask yourselves, once for all, whether a thing is<br />

or is not useful. What is useless cannot be pleasing to God, and what is hurtful is always<br />

displeasing to Him. Be very sure that God is only pleased with the sentiments that raise the<br />

soul towards Him. It is by practising His law, and not by violating it, that you can shake <strong>of</strong>f<br />

your terrestrial matter."<br />

726. If the sufferings <strong>of</strong> this world elevate us through the manner in which we bear them, are<br />

we elevated by those which we voluntarily create for ourselves?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!