17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 N.K. Shammas <strong>and</strong> L.K. Wang<br />

excursion occurs, a system must conduct a significant excursion evaluation <strong>and</strong> discuss the<br />

evaluation with the state prior to the next sanitary survey.<br />

3.3. Requirements for <strong>Membrane</strong> Filtration under the LT2ESWTR<br />

In order to receive removal credit for Cryptosporidium removal under the LT2ESWTR,<br />

a membrane filtration system must meet the following three criteria:<br />

1. The process must comply with the definition of membrane filtration as stipulated by the rule.<br />

2. The of a membrane filtration process must be established through a product-specific challenge test<br />

<strong>and</strong> direct integrity testing.<br />

3. The membrane filtration system must undergo periodic direct integrity testing <strong>and</strong> during<br />

operation.<br />

The rule does not prescribe a specific removal credit for membrane filtration processes.<br />

Instead, removal credit is based on system performance as determined by challenge testing<br />

<strong>and</strong> verified by the direct integrity testing. Thus, the maximum removal credit that a<br />

membrane filtration process may receive is the lower value of either of the following:<br />

1. The removal efficiency demonstrated during challenge testing.<br />

2. The maximum log removal value (LRV) that can be verified by the direct integrity test used to<br />

monitor the membrane filtration process.<br />

Based on this framework, a membrane filtration process could potentially meet the Bin 4<br />

Cryptosporidium treatment requirements, as shown in Table 4.1. Additionally, if a membrane<br />

filtration system has been previously approved for 5.5 log Cryptosporidium removal by the<br />

state, the utility would not be required to conduct source monitoring under the LT2ESWTR.<br />

These primary elements of the regulatory requirements for membrane filtration under the<br />

LT2ESWTR, including the definition of membrane filtration, as well as challenge testing,<br />

direct integrity testing, <strong>and</strong> continuous indirect integrity monitoring, are summarized in the<br />

following subsections.<br />

3.3.1. Definition of a <strong>Membrane</strong> Filtration Process<br />

For the purposes of compliance with the LT2ESWTR, membrane filtration is defined as a<br />

pressure- or vacuum-driven separation process in which particulate matter larger than 1 mmis<br />

rejected by a nonfibrous engineered barrier, primarily through a size exclusion mechanism<br />

<strong>and</strong> which has a measurable removal efficiency of a target organism that can be verified<br />

through the application of a direct integrity test. This definition is intended to include the<br />

common membrane technology classifications: MF, UF, NF, <strong>and</strong> RO. In addition, any<br />

cartridge filtration device that meets the definition of membrane filtration <strong>and</strong> that can be<br />

subject to direct integrity testing in accordance with rule requirements would also be eligible<br />

for Cryptosporidium removal credit as a membrane filtration process under the LT2ESWTR.<br />

In the guidance manual (3), such processes are called membrane cartridge filtration (MCF).<br />

Filtration processes that are reliant on mechanisms such as adhesion to filter media or<br />

accumulation of a fouling layer to remove particulate matter are excluded from the definition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!