17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Membrane</strong> Filtration Regulations <strong>and</strong> Determination of Log Removal Value 147<br />

necessary. Once the LRV of a membrane has been established through a challenge test that<br />

meets the requirements of LT2ESWTR, additional challenge testing is not required unless<br />

significant modifications are made to the membrane process. The rule specifies criteria for the<br />

following aspects of challenge testing:<br />

1. Full-scale versus small-scale module testing.<br />

2. Appropriate challenge particulates.<br />

3. Challenge particulate concentrations.<br />

4. Test operating conditions.<br />

5. Calculation of removal efficiency.<br />

6. Verifying characteristic removal efficiency for untested modules.<br />

7. Module modifications.<br />

The discussion of challenge testing in this chapter applies similarly to MF, UF, NF, RO,<br />

<strong>and</strong> MCF, except as otherwise noted. Although the primary focus of challenge testing as<br />

required under the LT2ESTWR is demonstration of Cryptosporidium removal, the general<br />

framework for challenge testing may be adapted for use in establishing removal efficiencies<br />

for other microbial pathogens of concern, including bacteria, viruses, <strong>and</strong> other protozoa such<br />

as Giardia.<br />

4.1. Core Requirements for Challenge Testing<br />

The LT2ESWTR specifies the core requirements that a challenge test must meet to<br />

demonstrate the removal efficiency of a membrane filtration system with respect to Cryptosporidium.<br />

These requirements are summarized as follows:<br />

1. Full-scale vs. small-scale module testing: Challenge testing must be conducted on a full-scale<br />

membrane module identical in material <strong>and</strong> construction to the membrane modules proposed for<br />

use in full-scale treatment facilities. Alternatively, challenge testing may be conducted on a<br />

smaller scale module that is identical in material <strong>and</strong> similar in construction to the full-scale<br />

modules.<br />

2. Appropriate challenge particulates: Challenge testing must be conducted using Cryptosporidium<br />

oocysts or a surrogate that has been determined to be removed no more efficiently than Cryptosporidium<br />

oocysts. The organism or surrogate used during challenge testing is referred to as the<br />

“challenge particulate”. The concentration of the challenge particulate must be determined using a<br />

method capable of discretely quantifying the specific challenge particulate used in the test;<br />

indirect water quality measurements such as turbidity, particle counting, or conductivity cannot<br />

be used for this purpose.<br />

3. Challenge particulate concentrations: The maximum allowable feed water concentration used<br />

during a challenge test is based on the detection limit of the challenge particulate in the filtrate <strong>and</strong><br />

is determined as follows:<br />

Maximum feed concentration ¼ 3:16 10 6<br />

ðFiltrate detection limitÞ:<br />

(1Þ<br />

This expression allows for the demonstration of up to 6.5 log removal during challenge testing<br />

if the challenge particulate is removed to the detection limit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!