17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

438 J. Qin <strong>and</strong> K.A. Kekre<br />

3.2. Description of Overall Process<br />

3.2.1. Plant Process<br />

The schematic diagram of the plant process is shown in Fig. 10.3. The secondary treated<br />

effluent was transferred by a submersible pump from the outfall sump through a duplex<br />

basket strainer (370 mm) to the feed tank. The large suspended solids in the raw feed water<br />

were removed by the strainer to prevent membrane fibers from being blocked or abraded. The<br />

filtrate water was then transferred to the UF unit by the UF feed pump. Alum was injected into<br />

the suction pipe before the feed pump by a dosing pump. The UF unit further removed<br />

suspended solids <strong>and</strong> colloidal materials from the filtrate water. The UF product was collected<br />

in the permeate tank <strong>and</strong> then overflowed into the drain.<br />

The UF unit could be operated in the filtration mode, backwash mode, <strong>and</strong> chemically<br />

enhanced backwash (CEB) mode (22). In the filtration mode, the UF unit was operated in<br />

dead-end <strong>and</strong> in-out flow at a fixed water flow rate by the use of a speed variable feed pump,<br />

<strong>and</strong> no retentate was discharged. In the backwash mode, the clean water from the permeate<br />

tank was transferred by the backwash pump into the shell side of the UF module, then went<br />

out from the lumen side of the fibers, <strong>and</strong> then carried the floccules on the fiber inner surface,<br />

finally was discharged into the drain from the retentate line. The CEB mode was similar to the<br />

backwash mode; in addition, chemicals were dosed into the suction pipe before the backwash<br />

pump as shown in Fig. 10.3. The cleaning chemicals used were NaOCl, NaOH, <strong>and</strong> H2SO4 to<br />

recover flux from the biofouling <strong>and</strong> scaling.<br />

3.2.2. Hollow Fiber Unit <strong>and</strong> Trial Runs<br />

The plant had two S-225 FSFC UF modules with total membrane area of 70 m 2 <strong>and</strong><br />

capacity of 2–7 m 3 /h. The UF unit was operated in a dead-end <strong>and</strong> in-out flow mode. Newly<br />

SUMP<br />

STRAINER<br />

LS<br />

FEED<br />

TANK<br />

V10<br />

AV70<br />

LS<br />

ALUM<br />

FEED<br />

PUMP<br />

AV11<br />

AV30 AV31<br />

AV12<br />

AV33<br />

MEMBRANE UNIT<br />

AV23<br />

AV25<br />

SV24 SV26<br />

FT<br />

21<br />

PT<br />

21<br />

PT<br />

12<br />

FT<br />

11<br />

H 2 SO 4<br />

SV13<br />

PT<br />

10<br />

PT<br />

22<br />

PT<br />

13<br />

V34<br />

BACKWASH<br />

PUMP AV60<br />

LS<br />

AV50<br />

LS<br />

AV40<br />

LS<br />

NaOCl<br />

NaOH<br />

Fig. 10.3. Schematic diagram of the plant process (13).<br />

SV32<br />

AV27<br />

LS<br />

RETENTATE<br />

PERMEATE<br />

TANK<br />

V20 V25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!