17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

406 K.C. Ng et al.<br />

Table 9.5<br />

Surface area, micropore volume, <strong>and</strong> pore size data of various parent silica gels (29)<br />

Sample<br />

name<br />

SiO2 (3A) 0.69 10 6<br />

SiO2 (RD)<br />

0.74 10 6<br />

SiO2<br />

(A þþ )<br />

0.75 10 6<br />

S BET (m 2 /kg) V 0.99 (m 3 /kg) Daver<br />

(nm)<br />

MPD<br />

(A ˚ )<br />

4.22 10 4 2.44 24.48 0.90 10 6<br />

4.48 10 4 2.42 24.27 0.93 10 6<br />

4.53 10 4 2.42 24.08 0.96 10 6<br />

capacity of RD type silica gel is remarkably higher than that of type A ++ silica gel when P/P0<br />

exceeds 0.4. So RD silica gel is recommended for adsorption desalination application.<br />

3. ISOTHERMAL ADSORPTION OF WATER VAPOR ONTO TWO TYPES<br />

OF SILICA GELS<br />

The common types of silica gel found in the commercial adsorption chillers are the Fuji<br />

Davison type “A,” <strong>and</strong> “RD.” Thermo-physical properties of both types of silica gels are<br />

reported by Ng et al. (31); the data are provided by Fiji Silysia Chemical Ltd., Japan, <strong>and</strong><br />

summarized in Table 9.6. One can observe that the thermo-physical properties of these two<br />

types of silica gels are similar. Although the type “RD” silica gel has a slightly higher thermal<br />

conductivity than type “A” silica gel, the most significant difference between these two types<br />

of silica gels lies in their water vapor uptake characteristics.<br />

Adsorption isotherms of silica gel þ water have were experimentally investigated by Ng<br />

et al. (31) <strong>and</strong> later by Wang et al. (32). They used two independent experimental methods, viz.<br />

the constant volume–variable pressure (CVVP) system <strong>and</strong> the variable pressure TGA. The<br />

experimental isotherm data of silica gel <strong>and</strong> water system were compared by these two<br />

methods <strong>and</strong> the isosteric heat of adsorption was derived from the equilibrium information.<br />

Two types of silica gels (Fuji Davison type A <strong>and</strong> type RD) were investigated under an<br />

assortment of chillers’ operation conditions (temperatures from 303 to 358 K <strong>and</strong> pressures<br />

from 500 to 7,000 Pa). The data collected from the two independent experiments were compared<br />

with each other <strong>and</strong> their trends are consistent with those of the chiller manufacturer.<br />

3.1. Constant Volume–Variable Pressure Test Facility<br />

Dubinin–Radushkevich Horvath–Kawazoe<br />

S mic (m 2 /kg) V mic (m 3 /kg) V mic (m 3 /kg) MPW<br />

(A ˚ )<br />

3.20 10 4 3.00 10 4 12.23<br />

3.29 10 4 3.17 10 4 12.52<br />

3.41 10 4 3.17 10 4 12.27<br />

S BET: specific surface area measured by BET method; V 0.99: the total pore volume estimated at relative pressure<br />

0.99; Daver = (4.0 V0.99)/SBET, according to the cylindrical pore model; MPD: mean pore diameter;<br />

S mic: micropore surface area; V mic: volume of micropore; MPW: mean pore width.<br />

As shown in Fig. 9.8, the CVVP system mainly comprises a charging tank (material<br />

SS304) with volume of 572.64 27 cm 3 inclusive of rated piping <strong>and</strong> valves, a dosing<br />

tank (material SS304) with volume of 698.47 32 cm 3 inclusive of rated piping <strong>and</strong> valves,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!