17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Treatment of Industrial Effluents, Municipal Wastes, <strong>and</strong> Potable Water 223<br />

Table 5.4<br />

Coffee factory effluent characteristics<br />

Effluent MBR influent MBR effluent Untreated Post-blended Permitted<br />

Flow gpd 48,900 – 114,915 163,815 237,600<br />

gpm 33.96 – 80 114 165<br />

TSS mg/L 390 0 230 160 500<br />

lb/d 160 0 220 220 990<br />

S-COD mg/L 5,390 250 820 645<br />

lb/d 2,200 100 785 885<br />

T-COD mg/L 6,240 250 1,230 930 2,000<br />

lb/d 2,545 100 1,180 1,280 3,000<br />

BOD5 mg/L 2,780 50 460 335 400<br />

lb/d 1,135 20 440 460 600<br />

TSS = 0 mg/L<br />

S-COD = 250 mg/L<br />

T-COD = 250 mg/L<br />

BOD5 = 50 mg/L<br />

After blending the MBR treated effluent <strong>and</strong> the untreated low-strength WW together, the<br />

resulting blended final effluent, indeed, met all effluent limitations in the permit.<br />

5.4. Example 4: Cosmetics Industry<br />

The WW discharged from a major cosmetics manufacturing plant in northern France was<br />

originally treated at the local municipal WWTP. Average flow rate was 160 m 3 /d (42,240<br />

gpd). In order to cut down sewer surcharge <strong>and</strong> fresh water costs, the plant set a goal to<br />

remove 90% of the total COD <strong>and</strong> recycle at least 30% of the treated effluent for non-process<br />

uses within the plant.<br />

5.4.1. Solution<br />

A pilot aerobic MBR test program was conducted at the plant using a 1 m 3 (264 US gal)<br />

pilot plant to determine treatability <strong>and</strong> to obtain full-scale design parameters. Results from<br />

the 5-month test program demonstrate the excellent overall performance of the MBR process<br />

system in terms of efficiency <strong>and</strong> reliability. Removal efficiencies obtained were 98%þ for<br />

COD, 99% for NH3–N, <strong>and</strong> 99% for FOG (fats, oils, <strong>and</strong> greases). Removal of TSS was total;<br />

yielding an effluent that could satisfy the recycle criteria within the plant (15, 20).<br />

Following the pilot test program, a full-scale system was designed <strong>and</strong> installed to h<strong>and</strong>le<br />

150 m 3 /d flow <strong>and</strong> 1,200 kg/d COD. The membrane filtration unit consisted of ceramic<br />

microfiltration modules, which were modular <strong>and</strong> suitable for expansion. The plant has been<br />

successfully in operation since the summer of 1994. Despite the variable flow rate <strong>and</strong><br />

characteristics of the influent WW (COD 2–6 g/L; COD/BOD5 1.8–2.5), the treated effluent<br />

from the innovative MBR process system has been of consistent high quality (COD < 100<br />

mg/L; BOD < 20 mg/L; TSS 0 mg/L; no bacteria). Part of the treated effluent is recycled for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!