17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gas-Sparged Ultrafiltration: Recent Trends, Applications <strong>and</strong> Future Challenges 673<br />

since these involve significant modifications to the membrane module <strong>and</strong> some cases are very<br />

energy intensive. Concentration polarization can also be controlled by solid–liquid two-phase<br />

flow (25–27). However, the added solids can damage the membrane <strong>and</strong> more importantly<br />

these need to be removed from the retentate stream. Gas sparging, i.e., injecting gas (e.g. air,<br />

nitrogen) in the form of bubbles into the feed stream has proved to be an effective, simple <strong>and</strong><br />

cost-effective technique for controlling concentration polarization (1, 12–13). Gas sparging<br />

works by formation of bubble induced secondary flow, physical displacement of the mass<br />

transfer boundary layer, scouring of the membrane surface <strong>and</strong> pressure pulsing caused by gas<br />

slugs (28). The contributions of these mechanisms in controlling concentration polarization<br />

depend of the type of membrane module <strong>and</strong> their mode of operation. The basic <strong>and</strong> applied<br />

aspects of gas-sparged ultrafiltration particularly the use of gas bubbles for permeate flux<br />

enhancement are discussed in detail in the subsequent sections.<br />

3. FUNDAMENTALS OF GAS–LIQUID TWO-PHASE FLOW<br />

In order to use gas sparging in an effective manner it is necessary to underst<strong>and</strong> gas–liquid<br />

two-phase flow behaviour. This section provides a brief overview of gas–liquid two-phase flow.<br />

3.1. Bubbles<br />

When gas is injected into a stationary liquid, gas bubbles are formed <strong>and</strong> these move<br />

upward due to buoyancy. The size of the bubbles depends on the way the gas is introduced<br />

<strong>and</strong> on the gas flow rate. The bubble motion generates a secondary flow behind the bubble,<br />

i.e., the wake region. The strength <strong>and</strong> extent of wake region depends on the shape <strong>and</strong> size of<br />

the bubble. Based on their shape, bubbles in stationary liquids are classified into spherical,<br />

ellipsoidal <strong>and</strong> spherical-cap bubbles. The shape of the bubbles can be anticipated empirically,<br />

as shown in Fig. 16.1 (29). As the bubble size increases, the shape of the bubble<br />

changes from spherical to ellipsoidal <strong>and</strong> eventually to spherical-cap.<br />

Spherical bubbles are small <strong>and</strong> their size is usually less than 1 mm. Since there is no<br />

boundary layer separation around such bubbles, there is no wake. Ellipsoidal bubbles are<br />

typically of 1.5–15 mm size. There is boundary layer separation around such bubbles <strong>and</strong><br />

hence these are followed by helical vortex wakes. Spherical-cap bubbles are usually big<br />

bubbles (>15 mm) <strong>and</strong> their primary wake is about 4.5 times the bubble volume (30). These<br />

big bubbles can generate strong secondary flow effect.<br />

The terminal rise velocity of spherical bubbles can be approximated by Stokes law (Re < 1),<br />

Ub ¼ d2 egðr1 18m1 rgÞ : (1Þ<br />

Ellipsoidal bubbles do not obey Stokes law <strong>and</strong> their rise velocity in water is approximately<br />

0.24 m/s (31). This rise velocity decreases as viscosity of the liquid increases. The rise<br />

velocity of spherical-cap bubbles can be approximated by,<br />

Ub ¼ 0:71ðgdeÞ 0:5 : (2Þ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!