17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

502 P. Kajitvichyanukul et al.<br />

Water samples were ozonated at transferred doses of 0.5, 0.8, 1.1, 1.8, <strong>and</strong> 2.5 mg O 3/mg<br />

DOC. Biological treatment alone resulted in 13–14% removal of DOC. Ozonation followed<br />

by biological treatment yielded 20–30% DOC removals. Biological treatment alone yielded a<br />

28% reduction in THMFP. Ozonation followed by biological treatment yielded a 40–47%<br />

reduction in THMFP. Ozonation followed by biotreatment yielded a 75–80% reduction in<br />

HAAFP. The reduction in THMFP with respect to ozone dose is shown in Fig.11.3. THMFP<br />

formation after biotreatment, but without ozonation, was approximately 220 mg/L. At the<br />

lowest transferred ozone dose of 0.8 mg O3/mg DOC, followed by biotreatment, THMFP<br />

dropped to 160 mg/L. THMFP was not reduced appreciably at higher O3/DOC ratios of 1.1,<br />

1.8, <strong>and</strong> 2.5. The removal behavior of HAAFP through biotreatment as a function of applied<br />

ozone dose was similar to that observed for THMFP. These results imply that THMFP<br />

reduction through biotreatment is sensitive to the presence or absence of ozonation, but<br />

insensitive to the ozone dose after a minimum ozone dose ( 0.8 mg/mg) is achieved. It is<br />

possible that the greatest reduction in PM molecular weight, <strong>and</strong> corresponding increase in<br />

PM bioavailability occurs when ozonation is introduced, <strong>and</strong> that further increases in ozone<br />

dose do not yield proportional decreases in PM molecular weight.<br />

The second study examined DOC removal through ozonation <strong>and</strong> biofiltration as a<br />

function of water type (123). The first water was raw surface water from the Ohio River<br />

(ORW). The second was artificial water, produced using a solution of humic substances<br />

isolated <strong>and</strong> concentrated from ground water. The humic substances were mixed with<br />

dechlorinated tap water to the desired DOC concentration. Dechlorinated tap water was<br />

used to provide the noncarbonaceous nutrients <strong>and</strong> mineral matrix required for the growth<br />

of microorganisms. Humic compounds are one of the major categories of organic substances<br />

that make up DOC <strong>and</strong> which act as PM. The bench-scale biological filter was shown in<br />

Fig. 11.2. DOC removals reported for the artificial water are significantly higher than those<br />

observed for any of the previously described studies that used natural waters. It is possible<br />

Fig. 11.3. Impact of ozone dose on THMFP removal (120).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!