17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Membrane</strong> Filtration Regulations <strong>and</strong> Determination of Log Removal Value 191<br />

Table 4.15<br />

Cryptosporidium, Giardia, <strong>and</strong> virus log inactivation values for UV (Source: US EPA)<br />

Log credit Cryptosporidium dose (mj/cm 2 ) Giardia dose (mj/cm 2 ) Virus dose (mj/cm 2 )<br />

0.5 1.6 1.5 39<br />

1.0 2.5 2.1 58<br />

1.5 3.9 3.0 79<br />

2.0 5.8 5.2 100<br />

2.5 8.5 7.7 121<br />

3.0 12 11 143<br />

3.5 15 15 163<br />

4.0 22 22 186<br />

Table 4.16<br />

Chlorine dioxide <strong>and</strong> ozone disinfection for Giardia inactivation (Source: US EPA)<br />

CT Values (CT99.9) for 99.9% inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by chlorine dioxide <strong>and</strong> ozone a<br />

Degrees ( C) 1 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Chlorine dioxide 63 26 23 19 15 11<br />

Ozone 2.9 1.9 1.4 0.95 0.72 0.48<br />

a These CT values achieve greater than a 99.99% inactivation of viruses. CT values between the indicated pH<br />

values may be determined by linear interpolation. If no interpolation is used, use the CT99.9 value at the lower<br />

temperature for determining CT 99.9 values between indicated temperatures<br />

equivalent. Moreover, the U.S. EPA Region 2 Filtration Avoidance Determination issued in<br />

May of 1997 also requires all WWTPs discharging into NYC’s Catskill <strong>and</strong> Delaware<br />

watersheds utilize by May 1, 2002 either microfiltration or an approved equivalent.<br />

Accordingly, NYC DEP developed <strong>and</strong> implemented protocols for a study that compares<br />

the pathogen removal capabilities of microfiltration (MF) <strong>and</strong> continuous-backwash-upflow,<br />

dual-s<strong>and</strong> (CBUDS) filtration by operating a pilot facility of each system, side by side, with<br />

the same influent <strong>and</strong> testing methods, shown in Fig. 4.8. The test units are located at the<br />

Stamford Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), immediately downstream of the secondary<br />

clarifier. This plant treats mostly domestic wastewater. The microfiltration unit is Memtec<br />

America Corporation’s Memcor 6M10C unit. The CBUDS test unit consists of two Parkson<br />

Corporation Dynas<strong>and</strong> filters operated in series. Both the CBUDS <strong>and</strong> the microfilter test<br />

units were operated using the manufacturer’s st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures.<br />

During each run of the pilot facility, the mean concentration in the spike solution tank,<br />

from which the spiking material was pumped into the influent stream, was approximately<br />

1 10 8 units per 100 L for both Giardia cysts <strong>and</strong> Cryptosporidium oocysts. Approximately<br />

42 L (11 gallons) of this solution was delivered to each effluent stream. Hence, the total<br />

numbers of Giardia cysts <strong>and</strong> Cryptosporidium oocysts delivered to each unit was approximately<br />

4.2 10 7 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!