17.12.2012 Views

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

Membrane and Desalination Technologies - TCE Moodle Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

682 K. Mohanty <strong>and</strong> R. Ghosh<br />

4.3. Gas-Sparging in Flat-sheet <strong>Membrane</strong> Modules<br />

Gas sparging in flat-sheet membrane modules has been less extensively studied. The first<br />

experimental work related to gas sparging in a flat-sheet membrane module was reported by<br />

Lee et al. (42). They studied the ultrafiltration of a bacterial suspension using 300 kDa PS<br />

ultrafiltration membrane <strong>and</strong> reported a 100% increase in permeate flux.<br />

Li et al. (51) examined flux enhancement by gas sparging in flat-sheet membrane modules<br />

using four different protein solutions (HSA, BSA, human immunoglobulin G <strong>and</strong> lysozyme)<br />

as test media. Two different membranes viz., polysulphone <strong>and</strong> polyether sulphone having<br />

100 kDa MWCO in each case were used. The effects of gas sparging on permeate flux, single<br />

protein transmission <strong>and</strong> protein fractionation were extensively studied. Gas sparging<br />

increased the permeate flux by 7–50% <strong>and</strong> as with other types of membrane modules, was<br />

found to be more effective at lower liquid feed flow rates. Protein transmissions in single<br />

protein ultrafiltration were reduced by gas sparging. Protein transmission was found to be<br />

lower with PS membranes than with PES membranes, this being attributed to protein fouling<br />

(see Table 16.4). However, protein fractionation was enhanced in binary protein ultrafiltration.<br />

Gas sparging affected the transmission of different proteins to different extents <strong>and</strong><br />

hence increased selectivity.<br />

Ghosh et al. (52) examined the effect of gas sparging on fractionation of proteins BSA <strong>and</strong><br />

lysozyme using a flat-sheet PS membrane having 100 kDa MWCO. Though the enhancement<br />

of permeate flux was reported to be only 10%, gas sparging enhanced the selectivity of<br />

protein fractionation very significantly. Nearly complete separation of BSA <strong>and</strong> lysozyme<br />

with gas-sparged ultrafiltration was reported. This was attributed to the disruption of concentration<br />

polarization layer <strong>and</strong> enhanced mass transfer due to bubble-induced secondary flow.<br />

Mercier-Bonin et al. (53) conducted experiments on yeast-cell ultrafiltration using a<br />

ceramic flat-sheet membrane. They also studied the effect of membrane orientation <strong>and</strong><br />

found that horizontally installed membrane modules were more efficient in terms of flux<br />

enhancement than vertically installed membrane modules. The maximum flux enhancement<br />

Table 16.4<br />

Effect of gas sparging on protein fractionation<br />

Protein (g/L) <strong>Membrane</strong> Flux (kg/m 2 h) Transmission (%) Selectivity<br />

NG a<br />

G b<br />

HSA, 4.5 þ IgG, 1.0 PES 100 25.8 31.3 18.5 (HSA) 5.6 3.7 c<br />

9.5 c<br />

68.3 (IgG) 53.1<br />

HSA, 4.5 þ IgG, 1.0 PS 100 22.5 24.7 5.5 (HSA) 1.7 4.25 c<br />

8.9 c<br />

23.4 (IgG) 15.2<br />

BSA, 2.0 þ Lys, 2.0 PES 100 45.5 53.3 38.46 (BSA) 6.04 2.47 14.83<br />

95.27 (Lys) 89.57<br />

a Without gas sparging<br />

b With gas sparging<br />

c Reversed selectivity, the ratio of IgG <strong>and</strong> HSA transmission<br />

NG a<br />

G b<br />

NG a<br />

G b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!