19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

humanism and the apotheosis <strong>of</strong> man 85<br />

Th is vision was further spelled out in his Th e Christian Religion (1474), the<br />

fi rst work ever published on the topic, and in his Platonic Th eology or the<br />

Immortality <strong>of</strong> Souls (1482), which brought together the pagan and Christian<br />

strands <strong>of</strong> his thought. 55<br />

Ficino’s views <strong>of</strong> religion were expansive. Indeed, he was convinced<br />

that while Christianity was best, there were many diff erent forms <strong>of</strong> legitimate<br />

religious belief and practice: “Divine providence does not permit any<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the world at any time to be completely without religion, although<br />

it does allow rites to diff er. . . . God prefers to be worshipped in any manner,<br />

however unwittingly . . . than not to be worshipped at all through<br />

pride.” 56 While Ficino’s Christianity is thus obviously infl uenced by Neoplatonic,<br />

Gnostic, and Hermetic sources, it is not anti-Christian. Central<br />

to his thought and to the Christian humanist enterprise generally was the<br />

notion that nature is a form <strong>of</strong> grace. 57 Th is idea is so important because<br />

it provides a foundation for the reconciliation <strong>of</strong> divine and human will.<br />

If nature is ordered by God so that humans naturally are attracted to the<br />

good, then humans can freely exercise their wills in a manner that is harmonious<br />

with divine will. Th e impediment to such a notion within the<br />

Christian tradition is, <strong>of</strong> course, original sin. Th e eff ects <strong>of</strong> original sin,<br />

however, are debatable, and humanists generally argued that it produced<br />

only a darkening <strong>of</strong> our reason that was not insuperable even before the<br />

redemption and that was even more easily transcended in its aft ermath.<br />

While this was contrary in many respects to <strong>of</strong>fi cial church doctrine, it was<br />

not un-Christian in its intentions.<br />

While Neoplatonism in this way provided a means <strong>of</strong> harmonizing humanist<br />

individualism with divine omnipotence, it came very near to Pelagianism<br />

in doing so, and in some instances clearly stepped over the line.<br />

Th is was certainly true in the case <strong>of</strong> Ficino’s student, Giovanni Pico de la<br />

Mirandola (1463–94), who pushed the humanist project to its limits and<br />

carried it in many respects beyond where Christianity could go.<br />

Pico was originally trained in the scholastic tradition. He also studied<br />

with the Jewish Averroist Elea del Medigo, and learned Hebrew and Arabic<br />

in Perugia, aft er developing a deep interest in the Kabbalah. 58 Th rough<br />

Ficino he came in contact with many other non-Christian sources and like<br />

him used them in his eff orts to shape a Christianity that could accommodate<br />

the spirituality he believed was essential to human thriving. Building<br />

on Ficino’s arguments in Th e Christian Religion, Pico asserted in his Oration<br />

on the Dignity <strong>of</strong> Man (1486), that humans were self-creating beings<br />

who could choose their own nature. Th is power for Pico is not intrinsic<br />

to human beings but is a divine gift . Human will and freedom are not a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> the fact that man is the highest <strong>of</strong> the creatures but a result

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!