19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

104 chapter four<br />

Luther was educated in this environment. He clearly admired the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cicero and counted Virgil and Lucian as two <strong>of</strong> his favorite authors,<br />

but he considered Ockham his master. 12 Whatever its intellectual merits,<br />

and they were many, this education was not spiritually satisfying for Luther.<br />

Th is is probably not surprising. From the time <strong>of</strong> Petrarch, humanism<br />

moved increasingly toward a Neoplatonist view <strong>of</strong> Christianity that<br />

focused on man as the imago dei and diminished the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Fall and original sin. During the latter fi ft eenth century the diffi culties<br />

<strong>of</strong> sustaining this position also led to an increasing skepticism not about<br />

the existence <strong>of</strong> God but about the capacity <strong>of</strong> human wisdom to understand<br />

the divine order <strong>of</strong> the world. 13 Humanism also employed its growing<br />

scholarly resources to demonstrate that Scripture was a human and<br />

not a divine creation. Nominalism, by contrast, raised questions not about<br />

the existence <strong>of</strong> God but about his goodness. Both rendered problematic<br />

the traditional religious answers to the problem <strong>of</strong> death and salvation.<br />

Humanism seemed to suggest that there might be no life aft er death and<br />

nominalism that even if there were an aft erlife there was nothing we could<br />

do to insure or even improve our chances <strong>of</strong> salvation. Luther’s education<br />

thus not only failed to provide him with the spiritual resources to confront<br />

the most serious problems <strong>of</strong> life, it suggested that no such resources were<br />

available.<br />

luther as a monk and his spiritual crisis<br />

Th e seminal event <strong>of</strong> Luther’s spiritual life, discussed above, occurred in<br />

1505 when he was caught in a violent thunderstorm. Fearing for his life, he<br />

made a vow to St. Anne to enter the monastery if God spared him. His fear<br />

<strong>of</strong> death and the vow he made point to severe religious doubts, for to fear<br />

death, as Luther himself later suggested, is to doubt the central tenet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Christian faith, the salvifi c power <strong>of</strong> the resurrection <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ, and<br />

to doubt this is to doubt that Jesus Christ is God. 14 More telling for Luther<br />

than the fear <strong>of</strong> death and nothingness, however, were his growing doubts<br />

about his own salvation in the face <strong>of</strong> a distant and harshly judging God<br />

who, as Ockham <strong>of</strong>t en repeated, was no man’s debtor. Luther’s entry into<br />

the monastery was partly a response to his fear <strong>of</strong> death, but was more fully<br />

a manifestation <strong>of</strong> his desperate search for a means to gain salvation. 15<br />

His spiritual concerns aside, Luther’s decision to enter a monastery <strong>of</strong><br />

the observant Augustinian Hermits in Erfurt was almost certainly due to<br />

the fact that it was a leading center <strong>of</strong> nominalist theology. Th ere he apparently<br />

studied theology under Johannes Nathen, who had spent four or fi ve

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!