19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

322 notes to pages 115–117<br />

50. Packer and Johnston, “Introduction,” in Bondage, 47.<br />

51. WA 18:684.26–686.13; LW 33:138–40. On Luther’s deus absconditus, see David C.<br />

Steinmetz, “Luther and the Hidden God,” Luther in Context, 2d ed. (Grand Rapids:<br />

Baker, 2002), 23–31.<br />

52. Packer and Johnston, “Introduction,” in Bondage, 54.<br />

53. Marius, Martin Luther, 187. See also Gerhard Ebeling, Evangelische Evangelienauslegung,<br />

3d ed. (Tübingen: Mohr, 1991), 258. “Luther’s God comes to us in darkness<br />

except for the light <strong>of</strong> Christ.” Marius, Martin Luther, 224.<br />

54. Oberman, Luther, 156.<br />

55. Marius, Martin Luther, 216.<br />

56. Th is claim is repeated throughout Luther’s work. For a relatively early example see<br />

his Second Christmas Sermon; Titus 3:4–8, taken from his Church Postil <strong>of</strong> 1522.<br />

“God’s Grace Received Must be Bestowed, “ WA 10.Ia:95–128 .<br />

57. Packer and Johnston, “Introduction,” in Bondage, 58.<br />

58. Oberman, Luther, 164.<br />

59. D. Martin Luthers Werke: Die Deutsche Bibel, 12 vols. (Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus<br />

Nachfolger, 1906–61), 7:9.23–29 (hereaft er WADB); “Preface to the Epistle <strong>of</strong> St.<br />

Paul to the Romans,” in Martin Luther: Selections from his Writings, ed. John Dillenberger<br />

(New York: Doubleday), 23 (hereaft er, Dillenberger).<br />

60. WA 40.I:235.15–17; LW 26:133. It is in this vein that we need to understand his advice<br />

to Melanchthon to sin bravely. He does not encourage him to sin but reminds<br />

him that we fi nite human beings are doomed to sin but that we must not forget<br />

that God forgives us our sins if we believe in him.<br />

61. “An Introduction to Martin Luther,” in Dillenberger, xxvi.<br />

62. WADB 7:10.16–17; Dillenberger, 24.<br />

63. Th is move has far-reaching consequences, not the least <strong>of</strong> which is the destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> traditional Christian ethics, for this view separates reward and merit and<br />

deprives good works <strong>of</strong> their scriptural warrant. Oberman, Luther, 154.<br />

64. WA 40.I:64.14–65.8; LW 26:21–22.<br />

65. Marius, Martin Luther, 204.<br />

66. Dillenberger, xxvii.<br />

67. Marius, Martin Luther, 232.<br />

68. WA 7:51.17; LW 31:346.<br />

69. Marius, Martin Luther, 255. Ernst Bizer follows the texts carefully to his conclusion<br />

that the “gospel” became for Luther not only revelation but the medium through<br />

which a Christian achieved righteousness. Th e gospel wakened faith. Bizer, Fides<br />

ex auditu: Eine Untersuchung über die Entdeckung der Gerechtigkeit Gottes durch<br />

Martin Luther, 3d ed. (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1966), 166–67.<br />

On this point see Marius, Martin Luther, 202.<br />

70. “For Luther, as for many others in his time, the belief that there was a God without<br />

knowing that He was a God for oneself was tantamount to atheism, that is, to<br />

acting as if His existence made no diff erence. . . . Th e transition from un-faith to<br />

faith occurs through the Word—usually the proclaimed Word—which is given<br />

and received in the miracle <strong>of</strong> faith.” Dillenberger, xxvii.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!