19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hobbes’ fearful wisdom 241<br />

In fact, such an alternative only becomes evident in an extreme situation<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> a chain <strong>of</strong> reasoning, that is, it only becomes apparent when<br />

we cannot fl y because death is everywhere and when we cannot hope to<br />

successfully fi ght because we can never be strong enough to overpower<br />

everyone else. Only under such circumstances do we realize that nature<br />

pushes us to establish covenants and that this decision is therefore not entirely<br />

voluntary.<br />

Of course, we may lie for strategic reasons, intending to break our covenant<br />

when it is to our advantage to do so. Here the voluntary component<br />

<strong>of</strong> the act becomes obvious. Th e law <strong>of</strong> nature thus is not self-enforcing.<br />

We do not automatically die when we break our promises; indeed, we<br />

sometimes thrive. In Hobbes’ view sanctions are thus necessary to sustain<br />

the agreements that make it possible for us all to escape from the war <strong>of</strong><br />

all against all. We break our oaths to increase our power in order to gain<br />

something we desire, and this can only be counteracted by institutionalizing<br />

the threat <strong>of</strong> violent death that the covenant eliminates, by reminding<br />

us <strong>of</strong> the priority <strong>of</strong> preservation to the other passions. In Hobbes’ view<br />

this fear is originally institutionalized by swearing an oath that invokes<br />

God’s wrath as punishment for violation. 111 Th e fear <strong>of</strong> the lord here plays<br />

a crucial role in leading us to wisdom. Indeed, in Hobbes’ view it is only<br />

through the terrifying fear <strong>of</strong> divine sanction that a covenant among human<br />

beings can originally be sustained, and even aft er human authority<br />

is in place, fear <strong>of</strong> divine sanction is a necessary support for the sovereign<br />

who cannot be everywhere at once. 112<br />

In the long term, this solution can only succeed in Hobbes’ view if some<br />

actual power is put in place <strong>of</strong> God to enforce the covenant. Th is is Hobbes’<br />

Leviathan, who like Moses “personates” God. He is a “mortal God” who<br />

instills obedience to covenants by means <strong>of</strong> the same overwhelming and<br />

overawing force that one fi nds in God. Peace, Hobbes believes, is only possible<br />

if humans are convinced they will suff er a violent and painful death<br />

if they break their covenant.<br />

Th e Leviathan is necessary to assure everyone that no one will break the<br />

fundamental covenant that guarantees the peace. Most men in Hobbes’<br />

view are unlikely to do so in any case, and for them the Leviathan is not<br />

a threat but a bulwark <strong>of</strong> their security. Th e real danger in Hobbes’ view<br />

comes from those proud or vainglorious men who think that they are superior<br />

to others and deserve to lord it over them. Th ese are the men the<br />

Leviathan must restrain, and it is for this reason that he is called the king<br />

<strong>of</strong> the proud. 113 As the biblical passage makes clear, “Th ere is nothing on<br />

earth to be compared with him. He is made so as not to be afraid. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!