19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

270 chapter eight<br />

<strong>of</strong> modernity reprise in a surprising way the earlier issues in the debate between<br />

Erasmus and Luther. Th is is not accidental. Both debates in fact are<br />

a refl ection <strong>of</strong> contradictions that are intrinsic to the metaphysical inheritance<br />

within which modernity unfolds. Granting ontic priority to nature<br />

directs attention away from the question <strong>of</strong> the superiority <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

or the divine but it does not eliminate it. In fact, it merely conceals the<br />

question within the naturalistic worldview that science articulates. However,<br />

this is not a question that can be long concealed, if only because it<br />

is the question <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the being who poses questions. In fact, it<br />

is this question that in the late eighteenth century reemerges in all <strong>of</strong> its<br />

power and brings the Enlightenment to an end.<br />

secularization or concealment?<br />

Th e persistence <strong>of</strong> the question <strong>of</strong> the nature and relationship <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

and the divine from Luther and Erasmus through Hobbes and Descartes<br />

to Kant points to the deeper question <strong>of</strong> the enduring importance <strong>of</strong> theology<br />

for modernity. In the preceding chapters, we have seen that the series<br />

<strong>of</strong> transformations that brought the modern world into being over a three<br />

hundred year period were the result <strong>of</strong> repeated (though ultimately unsuccessful)<br />

eff orts to develop a consistent metaphysica specialis that could<br />

account for the relationship between man, God, and nature within a nominalist<br />

ontology. While the importance <strong>of</strong> theology in this development<br />

is relatively clear, its continuing relevance to the further development <strong>of</strong><br />

modernity is less obvious. Indeed, many would argue that religion in general<br />

and theology in particular have become increasingly less important<br />

for the modern world. From this point <strong>of</strong> view, the problem <strong>of</strong> explaining<br />

the relationship between the three traditional realms <strong>of</strong> being within a<br />

consistent metaphysica specialis is “solved” in modernity by excluding the<br />

divine from the equation. As a result, knowing ceases to be conceived as<br />

metaphysics and is reconceptualized as a universal science that consists <strong>of</strong><br />

only physics and anthropology. Th eology is no longer regarded as a form<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge and becomes an expression or interpretation <strong>of</strong> faith, more<br />

akin to rhetoric or poetry than science. 23<br />

Th is decline in the importance <strong>of</strong> religion and theology in modern<br />

times has been characterized as the process <strong>of</strong> secularization. Secularization<br />

refers in the fi rst instance to the development <strong>of</strong> a secular or nonreligious<br />

realm alongside the world informed by religion, but during the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> modernity it has come to mean the expansion and dominance <strong>of</strong><br />

the secular realm and the concomitant diminution or disappearance <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!