19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 chapter two<br />

Petrarch and Augustine. Th e fi rst dialogue begins with Augustine’s assertion<br />

that Petrarch needs to remember above all else that he is a mortal being,<br />

for “there can be no doubt that to recollect one’s misery and to practice<br />

frequent meditation on death is the surest aid in scorning the seductions <strong>of</strong><br />

this world, and in ordering the soul amid its storms and tempests.” 87 Th is<br />

is the triumph <strong>of</strong> death over the passions that we discussed above. He asserts,<br />

however, that Petrarch like most men fails to confront death with the<br />

needed seriousness and deceives himself continually about himself, clinging<br />

willingly to his own miseries. 88 Th e rest <strong>of</strong> the fi rst dialogue lays great<br />

stress on the self-redressing power <strong>of</strong> will. 89 Knowledge, Augustine repeatedly<br />

asserts, is insuffi cient to bring about Petrarch’s moral reformation:<br />

“Th ere must be will, and that will must be so strong and earnest that it can<br />

deserve the name purpose.” 90 Th e good can only be truly loved if Petrarch<br />

thrusts out every lower desire, and it is only the pr<strong>of</strong>ound meditation on<br />

death that makes such purgation possible. 91<br />

In the second dialogue, Petrarch’s morals are evaluated in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

traditional seven mortal sins. While he is acquitted <strong>of</strong> envy, anger, and<br />

gluttony, he is charged to his surprise with pride and avarice and not to<br />

his surprise with lust and melancholia (accidia). 92 In contrast to the fi rst<br />

dialogue, however, the second focuses on failures <strong>of</strong> the mind rather than<br />

the will. But in this dialogue Augustine relaxes his moral strictures and<br />

says he never meant to urge Stoic abnegation on Petrarch but only a kind <strong>of</strong><br />

Peripatetic moderation. 93 Th at said, the dialogue closes with a characteristic<br />

Stoic claim that a soul serene and tranquil in itself will not be aff ected<br />

by cares <strong>of</strong> the world. 94<br />

Th e third dialogue is a discussion <strong>of</strong> Petrarch’s two most pr<strong>of</strong>oundly<br />

moving passions, love and fame. His love <strong>of</strong> Laura is characterized as a<br />

form <strong>of</strong> idolatry that robs him <strong>of</strong> dignity and liberty, intensifi es his melancholia,<br />

undermines his morals, and turns his desires from the creator<br />

to the creature. 95 As we saw in our discussion <strong>of</strong> the Songbook, both the<br />

human self and God are forgotten in such love. 96 Glory is also accounted<br />

a false form <strong>of</strong> immortality, but Petrarch is unable or at least unwilling to<br />

renounce it. 97 He does agree, however, to take Augustine’s advice to aim at<br />

virtue and let glory take care <strong>of</strong> itself. 98<br />

Th is pathway to virtue, however, lies not in a scholastic investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> man’s place in the natural order <strong>of</strong> things but in an introspective examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individual self. Th is examination, at least in My Secret,<br />

is achieved through an inner, imaginary dialogue with a spiritual mentor,<br />

in this case a friend that Petrarch knew only from books but in Petrarch’s<br />

mind a friend nonetheless. Th e self is thus understood not immediately but

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!