19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hobbes’ fearful wisdom 227<br />

out the concomitant struggle within Christianity to purge the church <strong>of</strong><br />

corruption that inevitably accompanied its involvement in temporal affairs.<br />

Does all <strong>of</strong> this then mean that the modern liberal world is a form <strong>of</strong><br />

Protestant Christianity as Mitchell suggests? Th e modern world certainly<br />

arises out <strong>of</strong> the Reformation and has a strongly Protestant character even<br />

when it seems most secular. Ins<strong>of</strong>ar as Protestantism always defi ned itself<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the deus absconditus, secularism can be understood as merely<br />

one <strong>of</strong> its extreme forms. Indeed, even if our age is defi ned by the death<br />

<strong>of</strong> God, as Nietzsche proclaimed, it is still defi ned by its relationship to<br />

God and therefore still defi ned theologically, even if only by a thoroughly<br />

negative theology. Nonetheless, it is also undeniable that theology in the<br />

modern age was itself transformed by its encounter with the ancient world<br />

and the development <strong>of</strong> a secular and a civic humanism. Th e humanist<br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> ancient ideas and practices has thus had an impact directly or<br />

indirectly (through Christianity) on the formation <strong>of</strong> modernity. Here it<br />

is principally a question <strong>of</strong> how much weight should be assigned to each<br />

element, and it is not surprising that diff erent scholars come to diff erent<br />

conclusions about this point.<br />

Th e most powerful argument for the revolutionary character <strong>of</strong> modernity,<br />

however, lies in the role it assigns to natural science. It is science that<br />

defi nes the modern world and science (or philosophy) that is widely considered<br />

to be incompatible with religion. However, over the last twenty years<br />

scholarship has demonstrated the deep debt that seventeenth-century science<br />

owes to Christianity and to the nominalist revolution in particular.<br />

Determining the importance <strong>of</strong> Christianity for modernity and for modern<br />

science is made more diffi cult in the Reformation period by two factors,<br />

fi rst, the increasing importance <strong>of</strong> belief or faith and decreasing importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice as a measure <strong>of</strong> one’s religiosity and, second, the proliferation <strong>of</strong><br />

Christian sects. Christianity had long sought to defi ne and enforce orthodoxy,<br />

but from the fourteenth century on the church found it increasingly<br />

diffi cult to sustain dogmatic unity. Even before Luther there was a growing<br />

multiplicity <strong>of</strong> ideas and practices within Christianity, and the Reformation<br />

saw an explosion <strong>of</strong> sectarian diversity. It is diffi cult to judge whether<br />

these sects are Christian in a narrow sense, but there is no question that<br />

most <strong>of</strong> their members were deeply religious. In trying to determine the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> religion on modernity it is crucial to recognize this diversity and<br />

not simply assume that those who dissent from a particular doctrine are<br />

irreligious or atheistic.<br />

Hobbes has <strong>of</strong>t en been characterized as an atheist, for the most part in<br />

his own time by sectarians who believed that anyone who did not share

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!