Theological Origins of Modernity

330 notes to pages 161–166
104. WA 18:783.17–36; LW 33:288–89.
105. WA 18:626.38–40; LW 33:53.
106. WA 18:627.10–12; LW 33:53.
107. WA 18:627.22–23; LW 33:54.
108. WA 18:632.11–12; LW 33:53.
109. Erasmus, Collected Works, 76:293.
110. Ibid., 76:294.
111. Ibid., 76:11.
112. Erasmus, Collected Works, vol. 77: Controversies: Hyperaspistes 2, 729.
113. Ibid., 77:737.
114. Ibid., 77:339.
115. Ibid., 77:471.
116. Ibid., 77:554–55.
117. Ibid., 77:650.
118. Ibid., 77:711.
119. Ibid., 77:340.
120. Ibid., 77:476.
121. Ibid., 76:lxxxii. Tracy, “Two Erasmuses, Two Luthers,” 57.
122. Erasmus, Collected Works, 77:622. Th ese exceptional divine interventions in the
order of nature are, of course, miracles.
123. Ibid., 77:723.
124. Augustine Contra duas epistolas Pelagianorum 2:21.
125. Erasmus, Collected Works, 77:420.
126. Ibid., 77:573.
127. Ibid., 77:455.
128. Ibid., 77:557.
129. Ibid., 77:690.
130. Ibid., 77:473.
131. Th is position is almost identical to that of Ivan Karamazov in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s
Th e Brothers Karamazov, trans. Constance Garnett (New York: Random House,
1950), 245–55.
132. Erasmus, Collected Works, 77:709.
133. Ibid., 76:13; Augustijn, Erasmus, 144; Gerrish, “De Libero Arbitrio (1524),” 199.
134. Erasmus, Collected Works, 77:710.
135. Ibid., 77:591.
136. Ibid., 77:593.
137. Ibid., 77:703.
138. Ibid., 77:539, 587.
139. Ibid., 77:734–35.
140. Ibid., 77:648.
141. Erasmus, Th e Colloquies of Erasmus, trans. N. Bailey, ed. E. Johnson, 2 vols.
(London: Reeves and Turner, 1878), 1:186.
142. Cited in M. M. Phillips, “Erasmus and the Classics,” in Erasmus, ed. T. A. Dorey
(Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1970), 14; see also Rabil, “Desid-