19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hobbes’ fearful wisdom 237<br />

Or to put the matter in diff erent terms, good is an increase in our power<br />

and evil its decrease. Th e greatest good is thus progressing towards satisfaction<br />

with the least hindrance, and the greatest evil the cessation <strong>of</strong> all<br />

movement in death. Each person in Hobbes’ view is thus a self-interested<br />

individual who seeks to maximize his own power and satisfaction. Th e<br />

problem is that we are also in competition with other human beings. In<br />

our eff orts to become masters and possessors <strong>of</strong> nature we are driven to<br />

seek mastery not only over natural beings but over human beings as well.<br />

In the state <strong>of</strong> nature, we are thus constantly at war with one another.<br />

Indeed, the principal threat to our preservation and power, according to<br />

Hobbes, comes from other humans. Th e reasons for this are not obvious,<br />

given Hobbes’ physics. Disease, drought, predatory animals, earthquakes,<br />

storms, and the like threaten us in real and unmistakable ways. Why then<br />

are humans more dangerous than more massive, speedy, and numerous<br />

nonhuman beings? Th e simple answer is that for Hobbes humans are more<br />

powerful because they use language. Language enables humans to extend<br />

their sway over the world and thus to become extraordinarily dangerous<br />

to other human beings. For Hobbes, the use <strong>of</strong> signs gives humans an extended<br />

memory that opens up both a past and future and thus makes selfawareness<br />

possible. 99 In contrast to all other beings, we have a capacity to<br />

recognize the ends towards which our passions direct us, the means for attaining<br />

these ends, the obstacles that stand in the way, and the dangers that<br />

threaten our existence. Th e world for humans is thus both more promising<br />

and more threatening than it is for animals. Ins<strong>of</strong>ar as we recognize this<br />

danger and are driven by fear to seek a remedy, we fi nd ourselves in a life<br />

and death struggle with other humans for dominance. Unlike ants or bees,<br />

we have no natural hierarchy and are more or less equal individuals driven<br />

by a desire for preservation and well-being. 100 We recognize that this can<br />

only be achieved by obtaining the means necessary to meet our needs.<br />

Since these needs extend into the future, our needs are limitless. Th erefore<br />

only the mastery <strong>of</strong> all human and natural motion can provide security<br />

and put an end to fear. Th e desire that all humans have for such means<br />

leads them into the war <strong>of</strong> all against all.<br />

Fortunately, the use <strong>of</strong> language that makes humans so dangerous also<br />

makes it possible to eliminate this danger. Th e war <strong>of</strong> all against all that<br />

characterizes life in the state <strong>of</strong> nature can be overcome by reason through<br />

the construction <strong>of</strong> an artifi cial world, the commonwealth, to supplement<br />

the world that God created. Human artifi ce thus can repair the work <strong>of</strong><br />

divine artifi ce, so that humans can live peacefully with one another. In<br />

contrast to Descartes, who sought only to control the motions <strong>of</strong> natural

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!