19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

342 notes to pages 214–220<br />

337–38. He found biblical warrant for Hermeticism in the references in Exodus to<br />

the Egyptian priests’ powers <strong>of</strong> transmutation. Leviathan, 297.<br />

19. Th is essay, included in Horae Subsecivae, is one <strong>of</strong> three that Reynolds and Saxonhouse<br />

have demonstrated were written by Hobbes. Th ree Discourses: A Critical<br />

Edition <strong>of</strong> Newly Identifi ed Work <strong>of</strong> the Young Hobbes, ed. Noel Reynolds and Arlene<br />

Saxonhouse (Chicago: University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1995), 71–102.<br />

20. David Wootton, Paolo Sarpi: Between Renaissance and Enlightenment (Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press, 1983), 3, 134. Hobbes corresponded with Sarpi’s<br />

assistant Micanzo for years. Martinich, Hobbes, 39.<br />

21. William Cavendish and Hobbes also composed essays modeled on those <strong>of</strong> Bacon.<br />

On this point see Arlene Saxonhouse, “Th e <strong>Origins</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hobbes’ Pre-Scientifi c<br />

Th ought: An Interpretation <strong>of</strong> the Horae Subsecivae,” Ph.D. diss., Yale University,<br />

1973.<br />

22. Martinich, Hobbes, 66.<br />

23. Noel Reynolds and John Hilton , “Who Wrote Bacon,” unpublished essay, 17.<br />

24. Th is long-withheld edition was published in 1629 as a critique <strong>of</strong> republicanism<br />

and particularly <strong>of</strong> parliament’s extortion <strong>of</strong> the Petition <strong>of</strong> Right the year before.<br />

Reik, Golden Lands, 37. Hobbes criticized those who believed that because they<br />

had read Tully and Seneca they were fi t to manage the state. Hobbes, Behemoth<br />

or Th e Long Parliament, ed. Ferdinand Tönnies, 2d ed. (New York: Barnes and<br />

Noble, 1969), 155–56.<br />

25. Aubrey, “A Brief Life,”150.<br />

26. Malcolm, “Hobbes,” 21.<br />

27. Ibid., 22.<br />

28. Ibid.<br />

29. Martinich, Hobbes, 108.<br />

30. Ibid., 107.<br />

31. Richard Tuck, “Hobbes and Descartes,” in Perspectives on Th omas Hobbes, ed.<br />

G. A. J. Rogers and Alan Ryan (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), 30.<br />

32. Donald Hanson, “Th e Meaning <strong>of</strong> ‘Demonstration’ in Hobbes’ Science,” Th e History<br />

<strong>of</strong> Political Th ought 9 (1990): 587–626. For an alternative view see Douglas<br />

Jesseph, “Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book <strong>of</strong> Nature,” Perspectives on Science 12, no. 2<br />

(2004): 191–211.<br />

33. Malcolm, “Hobbes,” 24.<br />

34. Ibid., 25.<br />

35. Ted Miller and Tracy Strong, “Meanings and Contexts: Mr. Skinner’s Hobbes and<br />

the English Mode <strong>of</strong> Political Th eory,” Inquiry 40 (Fall, 1997): 339.<br />

36. Malcolm, “Hobbes,” 29.<br />

37. Ibid., 30.<br />

38. Tom Sorell, “Hobbes’ Objections and Hobbes’ System,” in Descartes and His Contemporaries:<br />

Meditations, Objections, and Replies (Chicago: University <strong>of</strong> Chicago<br />

Press, 1995), 83.<br />

39. Patricia Springborg, “Leviathan and the Problem <strong>of</strong> Ecclesiastical Authority,” in<br />

Th omas Hobbes: Critical Assessments, 4:145.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!