19.01.2013 Views

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

Theological Origins of Modernity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hobbes’ fearful wisdom 253<br />

<strong>of</strong> the indulgences that so infuriated Luther. In denouncing these beliefs<br />

Hobbes was thus in the mainstream <strong>of</strong> the Reformation.<br />

Hobbes seeks to further reduce the infl uence that clerics derive from the<br />

fear <strong>of</strong> judgment by clarifying what is to occur on the basis <strong>of</strong> Scripture.<br />

Christ at his return will establish an actual kingdom and rule directly over<br />

humans. Hobbes ties this interpretation <strong>of</strong> the coming kingdom to the resurrection<br />

and immortality <strong>of</strong> the body promised in Scripture and articulated<br />

in the Creed. Everyone in his view will be resurrected in the body,<br />

some few will be chosen to live forever in the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> God, and the rest<br />

will be condemned to a second death though not to the eternal tortures <strong>of</strong><br />

hell. Th ere are no unending tortures awaiting the damned. Hobbes thus<br />

seeks to eliminate the terrors <strong>of</strong> eternal damnation. 158 Th e fear <strong>of</strong> the fi res<br />

<strong>of</strong> hell in his view is used by many radical sects to turn men against the<br />

state, and in eliminating it he hopes to strengthen the authority <strong>of</strong> the sovereign.<br />

Th is argument is unusual but is not without scriptural support.<br />

conclusion<br />

In a time <strong>of</strong> relative peace in his native France, Descartes laid out the foundations<br />

for a new science in his Discourse. In confronting the theologicalpolitical<br />

problem, he simply asserted that he held it wrong to do anything<br />

to upset the existing order. However, as he well knew, his science would<br />

certainly bring about a transformation in the order <strong>of</strong> things. His contemporaries,<br />

as we saw, were not deceived. His philosophical and theological<br />

views were similar in many ways to those <strong>of</strong> the Arminians, and as a result<br />

he was attacked by the dominant Calvinists in Holland and the dominant<br />

Catholics in France. Hobbes too had to deal with the theological-political<br />

problem, not however in a time <strong>of</strong> peace but in a time <strong>of</strong> brutal civil war.<br />

In his case there was no regnant church and state to support. Hobbes too<br />

had a vision <strong>of</strong> a science <strong>of</strong> motion, but he realized that this vision could<br />

only be realized if political conditions were more stable. He thus had to<br />

provide grounds for a political and religious order that would make science<br />

possible. He sought to do so by spelling out an order justifi ed by both<br />

natural law and Scripture, as revealed by both his science and his theology.<br />

Th e picture <strong>of</strong> the commonwealth governed by a mighty Leviathan<br />

resembled in many ways the institutions <strong>of</strong> Elizabethan England, but it<br />

was rooted not in mere traditionalism but in reason and a limited form<br />

<strong>of</strong> consent. Th eologically, Hobbes found it necessary to depart in two respects<br />

from Anglican orthodoxy, but he was careful that even his devia-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!