25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100<br />

some structural components of a theory of experience<br />

falsifiability. We have Fsb(c) >Fsb(e) >0.* 2 If we arbitrarily put<br />

Fsb(c) = 1, i.e. arbitrarily assign the number 1 to the degree of falsifiability<br />

of a self-contradictory statement, then we may even define an<br />

empirical statement e by the condition 1 > Fsb(e) > 0. In accordance<br />

with this formula, Fsb(e) always falls within the interval between 0 and<br />

1, excluding these limits, i.e. within the ‘open interval’ bounded by<br />

these numbers. By excluding contradiction and tautology (as well as<br />

metaphysical statements) the formula expresses at the same time both<br />

the requirement of consistency and that of falsifiability.<br />

34 THE STRUCTURE OF THE SUBCLASS<br />

RELATION. LOGICAL PROBABILITY<br />

We have defined the comparison of the degree of falsifiability of two<br />

statements with the help of the subclass relation; it therefore shares all<br />

the structural properties of the latter. The question of comparability can<br />

be elucidated with the help of a diagram (fig. 1), in which certain<br />

subclass relations are depicted on the left, and the corresponding<br />

Figure 1<br />

* 2 See however now appendix *vii.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!