25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some observations on quantum theory 221<br />

measurement; I have referred only to physical selection. 3 It is now necessary<br />

to clarify the relation between these two concepts.<br />

I speak of physical selection or physical separation if, for example,<br />

we screen off, from a stream of particles, all except those which pass<br />

through a narrow aperture ∆x, that is, through a range ∆x allowed<br />

to their position. And I shall say of the particles belonging to the ray<br />

thus isolated that they have been selected physically, or technically,<br />

according to their property ∆x. It is only this process, or its result, the<br />

physically or technically isolated ray of particles, which I describe as<br />

a ‘physical selection’—in contradistinction to a merely ‘mental’ or<br />

‘imagined’ selection, such as we make when speaking of the class of<br />

all those particles which have passed, or will pass, through the range<br />

∆p; that is, of a class within a wider class of particles from which it<br />

has not been physically screened off.<br />

Now every physical selection can of course be regarded as a measurement,<br />

and can actually be used as such. 4 If, say, a ray of particles is<br />

selected by screening off or shutting out all those which do not pass<br />

through a certain positional range (‘place-selection’) and if later the<br />

momentum of one of these particles is measured, then we can regard<br />

the place-selection as a measurement of position, because we learn<br />

from it that the particle has passed through a certain position (though<br />

when it was there we may sometimes not know, or may only learn from<br />

another measurement). On the other hand, we must not regard every<br />

measurement as a physical selection. Imagine, for example, a monochromatic<br />

ray of electrons flying in the direction x. By using a Geiger<br />

counter, we can then record those electrons that arrive at a certain<br />

position. By the time-intervals between the impacts upon the counter,<br />

we may also measure spatial intervals; that is to say, we measure their<br />

positions in the x direction up to the moment of impact. But in taking<br />

these measurements we do not make a physical selection of the particles<br />

according to their positions in the x direction. (And indeed, these<br />

3 Weyl too, among others, writes of ‘selections’; see Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik,<br />

p. 67 ff., English translation p. 76 ff.; but unlike me he does not contrast measurement<br />

and selection.<br />

4 By a ‘measurement’ I mean, in conformity with linguistic usage accepted by physicists,<br />

not only direct measuring operations but also measurements obtained indirectly by<br />

calculation (in physics these are practically the only measurements that occur).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!