25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

336<br />

new appendices<br />

simplified system first in my paper ‘Philosophy of Science: A Personal<br />

Report’. 5 It is the same system of six axioms which is more fully<br />

presented in the present appendix.<br />

The system is surprisingly simple and intuitive, and its power, which<br />

far surpasses that of any of the customary systems, is merely due to the<br />

fact that I omit from all the formulae except one (axiom C), any condition<br />

like ‘If p(b) ≠ 0 then . . . ’. (In the customary systems, these conditions<br />

either are present, or they ought to be present, in order to avoid<br />

inconsistencies.)<br />

I intend to explain, in the present appendix, first the axiom system,<br />

with proofs of consistency and independence, and afterwards a few<br />

definitions based upon the system, among them that of a Borel field of<br />

probabilities.<br />

First the axiom system itself.<br />

Four undefined concepts appear in our postulates: (i) S, the universe of<br />

discourse, or the system of admissible elements; the elements of S are<br />

denoted by lower case italics, ‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’, . . . etc.; (ii) a binary numerical<br />

function of these elements, denoted by ‘p(a, b)’, etc.; that is to say, the<br />

probability a given b; (iii) a binary operation on the elements, denoted<br />

by ‘ab’, and called the product (or meet or conjunction) of a and b; (iv)<br />

the complement of the element a, denoted by ‘ā’.<br />

To these four undefined concepts we may add a fifth—one that<br />

can be treated, according to choice, as an undefined or as a defined<br />

concept. It is the ‘absolute probability of a’, denoted by ‘p(a)’.<br />

Each of the undefined concepts is introduced by a Postulate. For an<br />

intuitive understanding of these postulates, it is advisable to keep in<br />

mind that p(a, a) = 1 = p(b, b) for all elements a and b of S, as can of<br />

course be formally proved with the help of the postulates.<br />

Postulate 1. The number of elements in S is at most denumerably<br />

infinite.<br />

Postulate 2. If a and b are in S, then p(a, b) is a real number, and the<br />

following axioms hold:<br />

5 In British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, ed. by C.A. Mace, 1956, p. 191; now ch. 1 of<br />

my Conjectures and Refutations. The six axioms given there are B1, C, B2, A3, A2, and A1<br />

of the present appendix; they are there numbered B1, B2, B3, C1, D1, and E1,<br />

respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!