25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

probability 175<br />

behaviour which I have described as ‘quasi-convergent’ or ‘statistically<br />

stable’. (Cf. section 61.) By recording statistically the behaviour of long<br />

segments one can establish that the relative frequencies approach<br />

closer and closer to a definite value, and that the intervals within<br />

which the relative frequencies fluctuate become smaller and smaller.<br />

This so-called ‘empirical fact’, so much discussed and analysed, which<br />

is indeed often regarded as the empirical corroboration of the law of<br />

great numbers, can be viewed from various angles. Thinkers with<br />

inductivist leanings mostly regard it as a fundamental law of nature,<br />

not reducible to any simpler statement; as a peculiarity of our world<br />

which has simply to be accepted. They believe that expressed in a<br />

suitable form—for example in the form of the axiom of<br />

convergence—this law of nature should be made the basis of the theory<br />

of probability which would thereby assume the character of a<br />

natural science.<br />

My own attitude to this so-called ‘empirical fact’ is different. I am<br />

inclined to believe that it is reducible to the chance-like character of the<br />

sequences; that it may be derived from the fact that these sequences are<br />

n-free. I see the great achievement of Bernoulli and Poisson in the field<br />

of probability theory precisely in their <strong>discovery</strong> of a way to show that<br />

this alleged ‘fact of experience’ is a tautology, and that from disorder in<br />

the small (provided it satisfies a suitably formulated condition of nfreedom),<br />

there follows <strong>logic</strong>ally a kind of order of stability in the<br />

large.<br />

If we succeed in deducing Bernoulli’s theorem without assuming an<br />

axiom of convergence, then we shall have reduced the epistemo<strong>logic</strong>al<br />

problem of the law of great numbers to one of axiomatic independence,<br />

and thus to a purely <strong>logic</strong>al question. This deduction would also<br />

explain why the axiom of convergence works quite well in all practical<br />

applications (in attempts to calculate the approximate behaviour of<br />

empirical sequences). For even if the restriction to convergent<br />

sequences should turn out to be unnecessary, it can certainly not be<br />

inappropriate to use convergent mathematical sequences for calculating<br />

the approximate behaviour of empirical sequences which, on<br />

<strong>logic</strong>al grounds, are statistically stable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!