25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some observations on quantum theory 237<br />

know of any of the particles in which direction it will turn after passing<br />

through the slit; but if we consider one definite direction we can calculate<br />

precisely the momentum component of all particles that did turn<br />

in this particular direction. Thus the particles which after having passed<br />

through the slit travel in one definite direction again form an imagined<br />

selection. We are able to predict their position and their momentum, or<br />

in short, their paths; and again, by putting a photographic plate in their<br />

path, we can test our predictions.<br />

The situation is in principle the same (even though empirical tests<br />

are somewhat more difficult) in the case of the first example we considered,<br />

namely the selection of particles according to their position in<br />

the direction of travel. If we produce a physical selection corresponding<br />

to this case, then different particles will travel with different velocities,<br />

because of the spread of the momenta. The group of particles will<br />

thus spread over an increasing range in the x-direction as it proceeds.<br />

(The packet will get wider.) We can then work out the momentum of a<br />

partial group of these particles (selected in imagination) which, in a<br />

given moment, will be at a given position in the x-direction: the<br />

momentum will be the greater the farther ahead is the selected partial<br />

group (and vice versa). The empirical test of the prediction made in this<br />

way could be carried out by substituting for the photographic plate a<br />

moving strip of photographic film. As we could know of each point in<br />

the band the time of its exposure to the impact of the electrons we<br />

could also predict for each point on the band with what momentum the<br />

impacts would occur. These predictions we could test, for example by<br />

inserting a filter in front of the moving band or perhaps in front of the<br />

Geiger-counter (a filter in the case of light rays; in the case of electrons<br />

an electric field at right angles to the direction of the ray) followed by a<br />

selection according to direction, allowing only those particles to pass<br />

which possess a given minimum momentum. We could then ascertain<br />

whether these particles really did arrive at the predicted time or not.<br />

The precision of the measurements involved in these tests is not<br />

limited by the uncertainty relations. These are meant to apply, as we<br />

have seen, mainly to those measurements which are used for the<br />

deduction of predictions, and not for testing them. They are meant to<br />

apply, that is to say, to ‘predictive measurements’ rather than to ‘non-predictive<br />

measurements’. In sections 73 and 76 I examined three cases of such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!