25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176<br />

some structural components of a theory of experience<br />

64 ELIMINATION OF THE AXIOM OF CONVERGENCE.<br />

SOLUTION OF THE ‘FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM<br />

OF THE THEORY OF CHANCE’<br />

So far frequency limits have had no other function in our reconstruction<br />

of the theory of probability than that of providing an unambiguous<br />

concept of relative frequency applicable to infinite sequences, so<br />

that with its help we may define the concept of ‘absolute freedom’<br />

(from after-effects). For it is a relative frequency which is required to be<br />

insensitive to selection according to predecessors.<br />

Earlier we restricted our inquiry to alternatives with frequency<br />

limits, thus tacitly introducing an axiom of convergence. Now, so as to<br />

free us from this axiom, I shall remove the restriction without<br />

replacing it by any other. This means that we shall have to construct a<br />

frequency concept which can take over the function of the discarded<br />

frequency limit, and which may be applied to all infinite reference<br />

sequences.* 1<br />

One frequency concept fulfilling these conditions is the concept of a<br />

point of accumulation of the sequence of relative frequencies. (A value a is said to be<br />

a point of accumulation of a sequence if after any given element there<br />

are elements deviating from a by less than a given amount, however<br />

small.) That this concept is applicable without restriction to all infinite<br />

reference sequences may be seen from the fact that for every infinite<br />

alternative at least one such point of accumulation must exist for the<br />

sequence of relative frequencies which corresponds to it. Since relative<br />

frequencies can never be greater than 1 nor less than 0, a sequence of<br />

them must be bounded by 1 and 0. And as an infinite bounded<br />

sequence, it must (according to a famous theorem of Bolzano and<br />

Weierstrass) have at least one point of accumulation. 1<br />

For brevity, every point of accumulation of the sequence of relative<br />

frequencies corresponding to an alternative α will be called ‘a middle<br />

frequency of α’. We can then say: If a sequence α has one and only one<br />

middle frequency, then this is at the same time its frequency limit; and<br />

* 1 In order not to postulate convergence, I appealed in the following paragraph to what<br />

can be demonstrated—the existence of points of accumulation. All this becomes unnecessary<br />

if we adopt the method described in note *1 to section 57, and in appendix *vi.<br />

1 A fact which, surprisingly enough, has not hitherto been utilized in probability theory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!