25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX *v<br />

Derivations in the Formal Theory<br />

of Probability<br />

In this appendix I propose to give the most important derivations from<br />

the system of postulates which has been explained in appendix *iv. I<br />

am going to show how the laws of the upper and lower bounds, of<br />

idempotence, commutation, association, and distribution are obtained,<br />

as well as a simpler definition of absolute probability. I will also indicate<br />

how Boolean algebra is derivable in the system. A fuller treatment<br />

will be given elsewhere.<br />

As an abbreviation for ‘if . . . then . . .’, I am going to use an arrow<br />

‘...→ . . .’; a double arrow ‘. . . ↔ . . .’, for ‘ . . . if and only<br />

if . . .’; ‘&’ for ‘and’; ‘(Ea) . . .’ for ‘there is an a in S such that . . .’;<br />

and ‘(a) . . .’ for ‘for all a in S, . . .’.<br />

I first re-state postulate 2 and the six operational axioms which will<br />

all be cited in the proofs. (The other postulates will be used implicitly;<br />

even postulate 2 will be cited only once, in the proof of 5.) In reading<br />

the axioms A3 and C, it should be kept in mind that I shall soon<br />

prove—see formula 25—that p(a, a) = 1.<br />

Postulate 2. If a and b are in S, then p(a, b) is a real number.<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

(Ec)(Ed) p(a, b) ≠ p(c, d),<br />

((c)(p(a, c) = p(b, c)) → p(d, a) = p(d, b),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!