25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222<br />

some structural components of a theory of experience<br />

measurements will generally yield a completely random distribution of<br />

the positions in the x direction.)<br />

Thus in their physical application, our statistical scatter relations<br />

come to this. If one tries, by whatever physical means, to obtain as<br />

homogeneous an aggregate of particles as possible, then this attempt will<br />

encounter a definite barrier in these scatter-relations. For example, we<br />

can obtain by means of physical selection a plane monochromatic<br />

ray—say, a ray of electrons of equal momentum. But if we attempt to<br />

make this aggregate of electrons still more homogeneous—perhaps by<br />

screening off part of it—so as to obtain electrons which not only have<br />

the same momentum but have also passed through some narrow slit<br />

determining a positional range ∆x, then we are bound to fail. We fail<br />

because any selection according to the position of the particles<br />

amounts to an interference with the system which will result in<br />

increased scattering of the momentum components p x, so that the scattering<br />

will increase (in accordance with the law expressed by the<br />

Heisenberg formula) with the narrowing of the slit. And conversely: if<br />

we are given a ray selected according to position by being passed<br />

through a slit, and if we try to make it ‘parallel’ (or ‘plane’) and<br />

monochromatic, then we have to destroy the selection according to<br />

position since we cannot avoid increasing the width of the ray. (In the<br />

ideal case—for example, if the p x, components of the particles are all to<br />

become equal to o—the width would have to become infinite.) If the<br />

homogeneity of a selection has been increased as far as possible (i.e. as<br />

far as the Heisenberg formulae permit, so that the sign of equality in<br />

these formulae becomes valid) then this selection may be called a pure<br />

case. 5<br />

Using this terminology, we can formulate the statistical scatter<br />

5 The term is due to Weyl (Zeitschrift fur Physik 46, 1927, p. 1) and J. von Neumann<br />

(Göttinger Nachrichten, 1927, p. 245). If, following Weyl (Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik,<br />

p. 70; English translation p. 79; cf. also Born-Jordan, Elementare Quanten-mechanik,<br />

p. 315), we characterize the pure case as one ‘. . . which it is impossible to produce<br />

by a combination of two statistical collections different from it’, then pure cases<br />

satisfying this description need not be pure momentum or place selections. They could<br />

be produced, for example, if a place-selection were effected with some chosen degree<br />

of precision, and the momentum with the greatest precision still attainable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!