25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

218<br />

some structural components of a theory of experience<br />

uncertainty relations. It is argued that, owing to this uncertainty of measurements<br />

in any atomic experiments, ‘. . . the result will not in general<br />

be determinate, i.e. if the experiment is repeated several times under<br />

identical conditions several different results may be obtained. If the<br />

experiment is repeated a large number of times it will be found that<br />

each particular result will be obtained in a definite fraction of the total<br />

number of times, so that one can say there is a definite probability of its<br />

being obtained any time the experiment is performed’ (Dirac). 3<br />

March too writes with reference to the uncertainty relation: ‘Between<br />

the present and the future there hold . . . only probability relations;<br />

from which it becomes clear that the character of the new mechanics<br />

must be that of a statistical theory.’ 4<br />

I do not think that this analysis of the relations between the<br />

uncertainty formulae and the statistical interpretation of the quantum<br />

theory is acceptable. It seems to me that the <strong>logic</strong>al relation is just the<br />

other way round. For we can derive the uncertainty formulae from<br />

Schrödinger’s wave equation (which is to be interpreted statistically),<br />

but not this latter from the uncertainty formulae. If we are to take due<br />

account of these relations of derivability, then the interpretation of the<br />

uncertainty formulae will have to be revised.<br />

75 A STATISTICAL RE-INTERPRETATION OF<br />

THE UNCERTAINTY FORMULAE<br />

Since Heisenberg it is accepted as an established fact that any simultaneous<br />

measurements of position and momentum with a precision<br />

exceeding that permitted by his uncertainty relations would contradict<br />

quantum theory. The ‘prohibition’ of exact measurements, it is<br />

believed, can be <strong>logic</strong>ally derived from quantum theory, or from wave<br />

3 Dirac, Quantum Mechanics, 1930, p. 10. *(From the 1st edition.) A parallel passage,<br />

slightly more emphatic, occurs on p. 14 of the 3rd edition. ‘. . . in general the result will<br />

not be determinate, i.e., if the experiment is repeated several times under identical<br />

conditions several different results may be obtained. It is a law of nature, though, that if<br />

the experiment is repeated a large number of times, each particular result will be<br />

obtained in a definite fraction of the total number of times, so that there is a definite<br />

probability of its being obtained.’<br />

4 March, Die Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, p. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!