25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

seen) by Heisenberg’s imaginary experiment which is the intuitive<br />

source of it all.<br />

There seems to me a fairly obvious connection between Bohr’s<br />

‘principle of complementarity’ and this metaphysical view of an<br />

unknowable reality—a view that suggests the ‘renunciation’ (to use a<br />

favourite term of Bohr’s) of our aspirations to knowledge, and the<br />

restriction of our physical studies to appearances and their interrelations.<br />

But I will not discuss this obvious connection here. Instead, I will<br />

confine myself to the discussion of certain arguments in favour of<br />

complementarity which have been based upon further imaginary<br />

experiments.<br />

(11) In connection with this ‘principle of complementarity’ (discussed<br />

more fully in my Postscript; cf. also my paper ‘Three Views Concerning<br />

Human Knowledge’, now in my Conjectures and Refutations, 1963,<br />

chapter 3) Bohr has analysed a large number of subtle imaginary<br />

experiments in a similarly apologetic vein. Since Bohr’s formulations<br />

of the principle of complementarity are vague and difficult to discuss, I<br />

shall have recourse to a well known and in many respects excellent<br />

book, Anschauliche Quantentheorie, by P. Jordan (and a book in which,<br />

incidentally, my Logik der Forschung was briefly discussed). 15<br />

Jordan gives a formulation of (part of) the contents of the principle<br />

of complementarity that brings it into the closest relation to the problem<br />

of the dualism between particles and waves. He puts it as follows. ‘Any one<br />

experiment which would bring forth, at the same time, both the wave<br />

properties and the particle properties of light would not only contradict<br />

the classical theories (we have got used to contradictions of this<br />

kind), but would, over and above this, be absurd in a <strong>logic</strong>al and<br />

mathematical sense.’ 16<br />

Jordan illustrates this principle by the famous two-slit experiment.<br />

(See my old appendix v.) ‘Assume that there is a source of light from<br />

which monochromatic light falls upon a black screen with two [parallel]<br />

slits which are close to each other. Now assume, on the one hand, that<br />

the slits and their distance are sufficiently small (as compared with<br />

the wave length of the light) to obtain interference fringes on a<br />

15 Jordan, Anschauliche Quantentheorie, 1936, p. 282.<br />

16 Op. cit., p. 115.<br />

appendix *xi 477

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!