25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

370<br />

new appendices<br />

between rain and Sundays, or whether a certain given formula for<br />

predicting rain on Sundays works, such as ‘at least once in three weeks’;<br />

but though we may reject this formula in view of our tests, we cannot<br />

determine, by our tests, whether or not there exists some better<br />

formula.<br />

(4) Under these circumstances, it seems tempting to say that randomness<br />

or disorder is not a type of order which can be described<br />

objectively and that it must be interpreted as our lack of knowledge as to<br />

the order prevailing, if any order prevails. I think that this temptation<br />

should be resisted, and that we can develop a theory which<br />

allows us actually to construct ideal types of disorder (and of course<br />

also ideal types of order, and of all degrees in between these<br />

extremes).<br />

(5) The simplest problem in this field, and the one which, I believe,<br />

I have solved, is the construction of a one-dimensional ideal type of disorder—<br />

an ideally disordered sequence.<br />

The problem of constructing a sequence of this kind arises immediately<br />

from any frequency theory of probability which operates with<br />

infinite sequences. This may be shown as follows.<br />

(6) According to von Mises, a sequence of 0’s and 1’s with equidistribution<br />

is random if it admits of no gambling system, that is to say, of<br />

no system which would allow us to select in advance a sub-sequence in<br />

which the distribution is unequal. But of course, von Mises admits that<br />

any gambling system may, ‘accidentally’, work for some time; it is only<br />

postulated that it will break down in the long run—or more precisely, in<br />

an infinite number of trials.<br />

Accordingly, a Mises collective may be extremely regular in its commencing<br />

segment: provided they become irregular in the end, von Mises’s<br />

rule is incapable of excluding collectives which start off very regularly,<br />

say with<br />

00 11 00 11 00 11 . . .<br />

and so on, for the first five hundred million places.<br />

(7) It is clear that we cannot empirically test this kind of deferred<br />

randomness; and it is clear that whenever we do test randomness in a<br />

sequence, we have a different type of randomness in mind: a sequence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!