25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

among those elements of S which are sub-elements of every element a n<br />

belonging to the sequence A; or in symbols:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

a = πa n if, and only if, a satisfies the following two conditions<br />

appendix *iv 351<br />

p(an, x) � p(a, x) for all elements an of A, and for every element x<br />

of S.<br />

p(a, x) � p(b, x) for all elements x of S and for every element b of S<br />

that satisfies the condition p(an, y) � p(b, y) for all elements an and<br />

for every element y of S.<br />

In order to show the difference between our (Boolean) product<br />

element a of A and the set-theoretical (inner) product or meet of A, we<br />

will now confine our discussion to examples S, satisfying our postulates<br />

2 to 5, whose elements x, y, z, . . . are sets, such that xy is their<br />

set-theoretic product.<br />

Our main example S1 to which I shall refer as ‘the example of the<br />

missing half-interval’ is the following.<br />

S1 is a system of certain half-open sub-intervals of the universal<br />

interval u = (0, 1]. S1 contains, precisely, (a) the decreasing sequence A<br />

such that an = (0, 1 2 + 2 − n ], and in addition (b) the set-theoretic products<br />

of any two of its elements and the set-theoretic complements of<br />

any one of its elements.<br />

Thus S1 does not contain the ‘half-interval’ h = (0, 1 2], nor any<br />

non-empty sub-interval of h.<br />

Since the missing half-interval h = (0, 1 2] is the set-theoretic product<br />

of the sequence A, it is clear that S1 does not contain the set-theoretic<br />

product of A. But S1 does contain the (Boolean) ‘product-element’ of A,<br />

as here defined. For the empty interval trivially satisfies condition (i);<br />

and since it is the widest interval satisfying (i), it also satisfies (ii).<br />

It is clear, moreover, that if we add to S1, say any of the intervals<br />

b1 = (0, 1 8], or b2 = (0, 3<br />

16], etc., then the largest of these will be the<br />

product element of A in the (Boolean) sense of our definition,<br />

although none of them will be the set-theoretic product of A.<br />

One might think, for a moment, that owing to the presence of an<br />

empty element in every S, every S will contain, like S1, a product element<br />

(in the sense of our definition) of any A in S; for if it does not<br />

contain any wider element satisfying (i), the empty element will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!