25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

probability 203<br />

class of occurrences;* 1 for example, ‘the probability of throwing five<br />

with the next throw of this die is 1/6′ or ‘the probability of throwing<br />

five with any single throw (of this die) is 1/6′. From the standpoint of<br />

the frequency theory such statements are as a rule regarded as not quite<br />

correct in their formulation, since probabilities cannot be ascribed to<br />

single occurrences, but only to infinite sequences of occurrences or<br />

events. It is easy, however, to interpret these statements as correct, by<br />

appropriately defining formally singular probabilities with the help of<br />

the concept of objective probability or relative frequency. I use ‘ αP k(β)’<br />

to denote the formally singular probability that a certain occurrence k<br />

has the property β, in its capacity as an element of a sequence α—in<br />

symbols: 1 k εα—and I then define the formally singular probability as<br />

follows:<br />

αP k(β) = αF(β) (k εα) (Definition)<br />

This can be expressed in words as: The formally singular probability<br />

that the event k has the property β—given that k is an element of the<br />

sequence α—is, by definition, equal to the probability of the property<br />

β within the reference sequence α.<br />

This simple, almost obvious, definition proves to be surprisingly<br />

useful. It can even help us to clarify some intricate problems of modern<br />

quantum theory. (Cf. sections 75–76.)<br />

As the definition shows, a formally singular probability statement<br />

would be incomplete if it did not explicitly state a reference-class. But<br />

although α is often not explicitly mentioned, we usually know in such<br />

cases which α is meant. Thus the first example given above does not<br />

specify any reference sequence α, but it is nevertheless fairly clear that<br />

it relates to all sequences of throws with true dice.<br />

In many cases there may be several different reference sequences for<br />

an event k. In these cases it may be only too obvious that different<br />

formally singular probability statements can be made about the same<br />

* 1 The term ‘formalistisch’ in the German text was intended to convey the idea of a<br />

statement which is singular in form (or ‘formally singular’) although its meaning can in<br />

fact be defined by statistical statements.<br />

1 The sign ‘. . . ε . . .’, called the copula, means ‘. . . is an element of the class . . .’; or<br />

else, ‘. . . is an element of the sequence . . .’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!