25.01.2013 Views

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

popper-logic-scientific-discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some observations on quantum theory 225<br />

statistically—no precise singular predictions can be derived. (I do not count either<br />

the law of conservation of energy nor the law of conservation of<br />

momentum among the formulae peculiar to quantum theory.)<br />

This is so because in view of the scatter relations, we must fail, more<br />

especially, to produce precise initial conditions, by experimentally<br />

manipulating the system (i.e. by what we have called physical selection).<br />

Now it is indeed true that the normal technique of the experimenter<br />

is to produce or to construct initial conditions; and this allows us to<br />

derive from our statistical scatter relations the theorem—which, however,<br />

only holds for this ‘constructive’ experimental technique—that from<br />

quantum theory we cannot obtain any singular predictions, but only<br />

frequency predictions. 1<br />

This theorem sums up my attitude to all those imaginary experiments<br />

discussed by Heisenberg (who here largely follows Bohr) with<br />

the object of proving that it is impossible to make measurements of a<br />

precision forbidden by his uncertainty principle. The point is in every<br />

case the same: the statistical scatter makes it impossible to predict what<br />

the path of the particle will be after the measuring operation.<br />

It might well seem that not much has been gained by our reinterpretation<br />

of the uncertainty principle. For even Heisenberg asserts in the<br />

main (as I have tried to show) no more than that our predictions are<br />

subject to this principle; and as in this matter I agree with him up to a<br />

point, it might be thought that I am only quarrelling about words<br />

rather than debating any substantial issue. But this would hardly do<br />

justice to my argument. Indeed I think that Heisenberg’s view and<br />

mine are diametrically opposed. This will be shown at length in my<br />

next section. Meanwhile I shall attempt to resolve the typical difficulties<br />

inherent in Heisenberg’s interpretation; and I shall try to make<br />

clear how, and why, these difficulties arise.<br />

First we must examine the difficulty over which, as we have seen,<br />

Heisenberg’s programme comes to grief. It is the occurrence, in the<br />

formalism, of precise statements of position-cum-momentum; or in<br />

other words, of exact calculations of a path (cf. section 73) whose<br />

1 The term ‘constructive experimental technique’ is used by Weyl, Gruppentheorie und<br />

Quantenmechanik, p. 67; English translation p. 76.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!