11.07.2015 Views

Revista del CEI - Centro de Economía Internacional

Revista del CEI - Centro de Economía Internacional

Revista del CEI - Centro de Economía Internacional

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SummaryAustralia – Argentina:Convergences and DivergencesLong-term trend and recent evolutionNéstor E. Stancanelli 1The comparison between Argentine and Australian societies has given rise to aca<strong>de</strong>mic interchange andspeculation regarding the reasons for a dissimilar <strong>de</strong>velopment. If the course of <strong>de</strong>velopment of the twocountries is analysed, differences regarding their economic levels and the quality of their institutions canbe seen from the founding of each state. Undoubtedly, in Australia, this is due to the importance of miningin addition to agriculture and to the establishment of a British-like parliamentary system. This small earlydifference persisted almost unchanged from 1900 until well into the nineteen seventies, which means thatduring this long period both societies have grown at the same pace and given rise to a significant<strong>de</strong>velopment of their human resources.Since the mid-seventies, Argentina’s economic growth has come to a halt and serious institutionalproblems that came from the 1930s substantially aggravated and led to the breakdown of the <strong>de</strong>mocraticsystem. From the economic si<strong>de</strong>, economic policies of exchange rate appreciation, fiscal <strong>de</strong>ficit, growingin<strong>de</strong>btedness to finance government expenditures, and continuous <strong>de</strong>ficit of the balance of payments werethe rule, with short intermissions, even after the <strong>de</strong>finitive restoration of <strong>de</strong>mocracy in 1983. Over the pastfour years, a major reversal of those policies and the restoration of strong economic growth have takenplace, changing the ten<strong>de</strong>ncy of divergence between the two societies that exten<strong>de</strong>d from 1975 to 2001.After analysing the long-term trend, this paper <strong><strong>de</strong>l</strong>ves into the period of the past thirty years and,particularly, the most recent past, with the aim of providing some responses to the questions that havebeen posed by different people, especially from the aca<strong>de</strong>mic sector, regarding the convergences anddivergences between both countries.1. IntroductionThere are several comparative analysis studies on the evolution of Australia and Argentina which consi<strong>de</strong>rthe period beginning in the second half of the nineteenth century up to recent <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s. Similarly, thepublication of newspaper articles and the broadcast of television and radio programmes <strong>de</strong>dicated to thesubject are regularly observed in our society. The most important Australian work, which en<strong>de</strong>avoured toprovi<strong>de</strong> an answer to the questions about the convergences and divergences between the two countriesregarding their economic and social progress, is the book entitled Australia and Argentina: On parallelpaths, written in the mid-1980s by John Fogarty and Tim Duncan, professors at the University ofMelbourne. This publication was the product of an intense intellectual interchange with Argentinecolleagues and even of a sabbatical year John Fogarty spent in Argentina.As to the similarities between the two countries, the aspects that chiefly call our attention are the vastnessof their territories, on the one hand, and their natural and human resource endowments, on the other. Athird feature is their participation in the world economy through the open mo<strong><strong>de</strong>l</strong> which characterisedinternational relations between 1850 and 1930, based on the exchange of primary products formanufactured goods from European centres, particularly the UK. Politically, this mo<strong><strong>de</strong>l</strong> was reinforced inAustralia as well as in Argentina by the respective constitutions enacted in 1853 in the former, and 1900 inthe latter. Another significant characteristic was given by public investment in infrastructure, largelysupported by external funding, as well as the formation of qualified state bureaucracies, the establishment1 Special thanks to Mariángeles Polonsky for her collaboration with tables and graphics on this article.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!