04.12.2021 Views

Spiritual_Wellness_Holistic_Health_and_the_Practic

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 Philosophical Foundations of Health Education

was evolved into a separate discipline from physical education. These perspectives

should be integrated with Smuts ’ philosophy of holism.

The holistic perspective will help health educators accomplish the goals of facilitating

health as a positive condition of the individual as a whole. The philosophical

tenets of holism are conducive to health education curricula based upon the conceptual

approach, for example, the School Health Education Study, 1967. Holism can be synthesized

into a philosophical framework from which the spiritual dimension of health

can be developed without contradicting the science of evolution.

In addition, we should research and develop Smuts ’ science of Personology and

the method of biography as one means to determine the principles of health as a

dynamic condition of the individual considered as a whole organism - personality (synthetically

versus analytically). Holistic research designs for health education may be

derived from the work of the general systems theorists, such as Ludwig von Bertalanffy;

the studies of existential, humanistic psychologists; and those psychotherapists who

advocate a holistic view of humankind — for example, Perls ’ Gestalt therapy,

Assagioli ’ s psychosynthesis, and Tournier ’ s “ whole person ” therapy.

Within the historical and philosophical context of holism, we can develop a set of

principles to guide our attitudes towards health, our teaching methods, and our understanding

of the relationships between mind and body, teacher and student, human and

environment, health educator and the health care delivery system.

The holistic worldview serves as the rational premise necessary to produce health

education professionals devoted to the understanding and furtherance of health as a

positive goal.

REFERENCES

Hoyman, H. (1970). An editorial: Health and a living faith. Journal of School Health, 40 (6), 279 – 280.

Hoyman, H. (1971). Human ecology and health education II. Journal of School Health, 41 (10), 538 – 547.

Hoyman, H. (1972a). Health ethics and relevant issues. Journal of School Health, 42 (8), 516 – 525.

Hoyman, H. (1972b). New frontiers in health education. Journal of School Health, 43 (7), 423 – 430.

Hoyman, H. (1974). Models of human nature and their impact on health education. Journal of School Health,

44 (7), 374 – 381.

Oberteuffer, D. (1938). Re - evaluation of the professional curriculum. Journal of Health and Physical Education,

9 (8), 469 – 522.

Oberteuffer, D. (1945). Some contributions of physical education to an educated life. Journal of Health and

Physical Education, 16 (1), 3 – 57.

Oberteuffer, D. (1953). Philosophy and principles of the school health program. Journal of School Health, 23 (4),

103 – 109.

Oberteuffer, D. (1965). A challenge to the profession. Journal of Health and Physical Education, 26 (1), 3 – 12.

Smuts, J. C. (1926). Holism and evolution . New York: Macmillan.

Williams, J. F. (1935). Today ’ s challenge to health and physical education. Journal of Health and Physical

Education, 6 (8), 10 – 63.

Williams, J. F. (1942). Persons in a plan. Journal of Health and Physical Education, 13 (6), 349 – 365.

Williams, J. F. (1943). Physiological implications of fitness in women ’ s athletics. Journal of Health and Physical

Education, 14 (9), 469 – 509.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!