23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 103<br />

In order to address this concern <strong>FortisBC</strong> consulted experts (such as Util-Assist, Navigant, and<br />

Exponent), and employed two RFP processes to identify the AMI solution presented in this 2012<br />

AMI CPCN <strong>Application</strong>. Ultimately, <strong>FortisBC</strong> selected Itron Canada as the vendor <strong>for</strong> the major<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the AMI Project, and negotiated a firm contract <strong>for</strong> a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> project<br />

costs. Finally, <strong>FortisBC</strong> ensured that a comprehensive consultation process was followed in<br />

order to ensure that the Company understood its Stakeholders views on AMI.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> these activities required significantly more time, and internal resources (in addition to the<br />

external resources noted above) than did the 2007 AMI <strong>Application</strong>.<br />

Response:<br />

50.1.2 Please list and describe the cost categories that are included in the<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecast regulatory costs <strong>of</strong> $2,660 thousand and provide the cost<br />

allocation <strong>for</strong> each category identified.<br />

Please refer to Errata No. 1 which provides a correction to the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecast regulatory<br />

costs presented in Table 5.1.1.a, which should have read $2.0 million. The cost categories (and<br />

allocations) included in the estimated regulatory costs are as follows:<br />

Cost Category<br />

Allocation<br />

($000s)<br />

PACA 500<br />

Legal 800<br />

Consultant and Expert<br />

Witnesses<br />

200<br />

Travel, accommodation, and<br />

miscellaneous<br />

15<br />

Printing and Postage 20<br />

Advertising 50<br />

Oral Hearing Venue 15<br />

Commission Costs 400<br />

Total 2,000<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> notes that depending on the length and nature <strong>of</strong> the Commission’s review process <strong>for</strong><br />

the Company’s AMI <strong>Application</strong>, the actual regulatory costs incurred could be higher or lower<br />

than currently <strong>for</strong>ecast.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> the line items in the table:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!