23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 119<br />

53.14.1 Explain how the deployment and post-deployment benefits will be<br />

tracked and be returned to the ratepayers.<br />

Please refer to the response BCUC IR1 Q54.14.2.<br />

Response:<br />

53.14.2 Does <strong>FortisBC</strong> propose accumulating the benefits in a holding<br />

account to be dealt with in subsequent revenue requirement<br />

applications be<strong>for</strong>e being taken in as revenue?<br />

No. Consistent with all capital projects undertaken by the Company, the benefits would be<br />

incorporated into Revenue Requirements either as cost reductions or incremental revenue as<br />

they are <strong>for</strong>ecast to be realized. Attempting to accumulate the benefits in a "holding" deferral<br />

account would be inconsistent with the treatment <strong>of</strong> other capital, would provide no incremental<br />

benefit to customers and would add additional administrative burden to the utility. The Company<br />

has <strong>for</strong>ecast loss reductions <strong>of</strong> 2 GWh associated with theft reduction due to AMI in its 2012 –<br />

2013 Revenue Requirements <strong>Application</strong>.<br />

Response:<br />

53.15 Please explain why theft reduction is not part <strong>of</strong> the OPEX expenditures/benefits.<br />

Theft reduction benefits are a combination <strong>of</strong> power purchase reductions and revenue<br />

increases, and so have been separated from capital and operating expenses.<br />

Response:<br />

53.16 Provide a cash flow diagram <strong>of</strong> the costs and benefits <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Application</strong>.<br />

Please refer to the response to BCUC IR1 96.1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!